Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for respin of 2019-06

Hi Ed Let's continue the discussion in https://bugs.eclipse.org/548397. We first need to see whether this really has a serious impact. Only then we can start the discussion about a respin (after we have a fix, of course). Dani From: Ed Merks To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for respin of 2019-06

Markus, Thanks. :-) I have the product catalogs ready to commit at just the right time tomorrow as well. Regards, Ed On 18.06.2019 19:33, Markus Knauer wrote: The .../epp/packages/2019-06 repo is now in its expected, normal state. Thanks, Markus On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 18:29, Markus

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for respin of 2019-06

The .../epp/packages/2019-06 repo is now in its expected, normal state. Thanks, Markus On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 18:29, Markus Knauer wrote: > I'm concerned, too, about the bug 548397 > you were > mentioning in your mail. > > Regarding the p2

[cross-project-issues-dev] Disk usage report for HIPP/JIPPs

Compiled 2019-06-18-13:30:01 Projects exceeding 80G of disk space on HIPP/JIPPs: === 281G /jobs/genie.packaging 254G /jobs/genie.eclipselink 127G /jobs/genie.orion 117G /jobs/genie.capella 101G /jobs/genie.osee 95G /jobs/genie.platform 88G

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for respin of 2019-06

I'm concerned, too, about the bug 548397 you were mentioning in your mail. Regarding the p2 repo: That is on my list and a routine task. The p2 repository itself is small, and usually no issue to be mirrored. Thanks, Markus On Tue, 18 Jun

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for respin of 2019-06

At the moment, the missing signatures of Windows executables in any of the p2 repositories is starting to look like a pretty serious problem.  E.g., this file does not contain a signed eclipse.exe

[cross-project-issues-dev] Request for respin of 2019-06

Hello, everybody, I'm sorry for the late communication during quiet week. I wanted to get involved in the corresponding discussion about the Respin: I would be happy about a Respin, that would allow me to update the GEF contribution for the release, which fixes a little annoyance in the user

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

If this update site is configured: yes Am 18. Juni 2019, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Michael Keppler : > Am 18.06.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Christian Dietrich: > > This would only work if update site is changed > > The Xtext (SDK) feature contains an update site reference to >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

Am 18.06.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Christian Dietrich: This would only work if update site is changed The Xtext (SDK) feature contains an update site reference to http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/composite/releases. So as long as your final release is available there, auto

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

This would only work if update site is changed Am 18. Juni 2019, 16:53 +0200 schrieb Denis Roy : > +1 > > Doesn't Eclipse "check for updates" once in a while? Can the fix be > included there? > > > > On 2019-06-18 10:44 a.m., Frederic Gurr wrote: > > It's quite unfortunate, but inconsistencies

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

+1 Doesn't Eclipse "check for updates" once in a while? Can the fix be included there? On 2019-06-18 10:44 a.m., Frederic Gurr wrote: > It's quite unfortunate, but inconsistencies and annoyances do not > justify a respin less than 24h before the GA. -1 from my side. > > On 18.06.19 16:25,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

It's quite unfortunate, but inconsistencies and annoyances do not justify a respin less than 24h before the GA. -1 from my side. On 18.06.19 16:25, Christian Dietrich wrote: > there is nothing super critical but rather inconsistencies and annoyances. > all of these could be circumvented by

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

there is nothing super critical but rather inconsistencies and annoyances. all of these could be circumvented by installing Xtext 2.18.0 from the Xtext release update site Am 18.06.19 um 15:57 schrieb Gunnar Wagenknecht: > Christian, > > Do you have a "bad impact" analysis if the release goes out

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

Christian, Do you have a "bad impact" analysis if the release goes out with this old version of XText, eg., are there known regressions? -Gunnar -- Gunnar Wagenknecht gun...@wagenknecht.org, http://guw.io/ > On Jun 18, 2019, at 09:27, Dietrich, Christian > wrote: > > Dear PMC &

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

Christian, I will reluctantly give it a +0. Sorry, it's really very short notice and a significant number of people will need to take action to make this happen, including people in Europe for whom this is already late in the day (I'm in Ottawa today), suggesting that this perhaps can't be

[cross-project-issues-dev] Request for Respin 2019-06

Dear PMC & cross-project members, the Xtext team is apologising for speaking up in the quiet week of 2019-06. SimRel. We currently have Xtext 2.18.0 M3 in the simrel since https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/143227/2/tmf-xtext.aggrcon was never merged after the simrel builder server downtime (around