Hi,
The current status is:
- I recently changed version to 5.1 on master
- going to contribute it to Luna ~RC1
- there should not be any compatibility problems
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Simon Bernard
sbern...@sierrawireless.comwrote:
We still got no answer about DLTK
Ideally, all the project tests should be executed - using dependencies from
the simultaneous release repository.
Also, some checks of the compiled classes should be made (e.g. load them
all?), to verify that dependencies in the repository are compatible with
those used at compile time.
Regards,
against DLTK-nightly builds for last
months, so we prefer DLTK 5.0.
thanks,
Jacek
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alexey Panchenko alex.panche...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately The DLTK team were quite busy this year with other
projects. Initially the previous (4.0, released 2012
Hi David,
DLTK is going to participate, we are just short on time these days.
I've just enabled our contribution (for now with the same content as for
Juno release).
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:09 PM, David M Williams
david_willi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Still 26 projects not
LinkageError is still there:
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/dltk-nightly/scmPollLog/
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 21:47, Matthew Heitz mhe...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Adding executors has resulted in the return of the LinkageError. *sigh*
java.io.IOException: Remote call on hudson-slave1 failed
