Hello,
There is a major regression in Eclipse batch compiler in the current
4.7.x branch compared to 4.7.1, which essentially breaks all users who
run on java8 and do annotation processing (more info in [1]). I'd like
to ask to backport https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/112386/ and can propose
a
Is it me, or http://git.eclipse.org/c/ does not work today? The search
always says No repositories found. Clicking on any repository in the
list does not do anything useful. Seems similar to
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=445288 reported awhile
back, which was marked closed/fixed
I am pretty sure we are not allowed to collect usage data. Wayne still
can't decide the policy around this [1]. I have some opensource code for
out-of-eclipse usage collection which I use with my m2e extensions, if
you are interested.
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=413169
--
You can use jetty to create in-process http proxy servers. There is
helper for this in m2e [1] and I think Tycho has something similar too.
There is also MockWebServer from Square [2], which arguably gives you
finer control over your test server behaviour. We use it to test some
aspects of Aether
Just to clarify, m2e is quite happy with guava 15 included in sim rel
and we will need to validate if guava 18 breaks anything. m2e does plan
to ship separate guava 18 as part of embedded maven runtime, but this
copy is not exported to OSGi and should not interfere with guava
used by other OSGi
This is getting off-topic, but I think we should plan to move to java 8
for the next release after mars. If we start talking about this now and
announce this as part of mars release, I think this gives users plenty
of time to prepare and less excuse for grumbling (although I imagine
there still
What major distribution still stuck with GTK2? Aren't they all on GTK3
already?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2014-10-08, 2:40, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marc-André Laperle marc-andre.lape...@ericsson.com
To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
-08, 9:27, Mat Booth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Sent: Wednesday, 8 October, 2014 12:38:10 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Limiting GTK versions supported by SWT
or SWT call for help
What major
, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
m2e will participate in Mars simultaneous release. m2e offset is +2,
iirc. We'll contribute the same build to Mars as we did in Luna.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.m2e/releases/1.5.0
--
Regards,
Igor
___
cross
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2014-09-02, 10:52, Wayne Beaton wrote:
There were 26 commits in August.
Why no new release?
Wayne
On 29/08/14 07:25 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
m2e will participate in Mars simultaneous release. m2e
m2e will participate in Mars simultaneous release. m2e offset is +2,
iirc. We'll contribute the same build to Mars as we did in Luna.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.m2e/releases/1.5.0
--
Regards,
Igor
___
cross-project-issues-dev
FWIW, we build m2e against simrel repository and don't have any problems.
http://ci.tesla.io:8080/view/m2e/job/m2eclipse-core/
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2014-06-27, 10:27, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:49, Doug Schaefer wrote:
We build directly against the Eclipse one. Does
Little late to the party, but I'd like to suggest adding RC4 to Luna
composite and making this part of symrel process going forward. By
hiding RC4 under obscure URL we artificially limit amount of testing
it gets and make it harder for downstream projects validate their code
will still work
.
From: Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 06/19/2014 07:55 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Luna RC4 staging repo is complete
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
This is tracked as Tycho
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=436159
Either use Platform build with 435888 fixed or switch to Tycho
0.21 snapshot, which should be more tolerate to exceptions during test
framework shutdown.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2014-06-06, 12:17, Thomas Watson wrote:
On 2014-06-02, 5:31, Ed Willink wrote:
a) Guava must not be exported and so avoid OSGI class loader confusion.
- API tooling could warn if any non-singleton plugin is exported.
b) Requirements to load Guava classes must not be exported
- API tooling could warn if a class in a non-singleton
Are you talking about separate update site with java 8 patches for
kepler or full-blown release?
In any case, m2e does not plan to participate. Anyone who wants to use
m2e with java 8 support on kepler will have to install m2e 1.5
milestone/snapshot build from m2e specific repository.
--
I am not sure I understand what you mean by Artifacts ... are deployed
automatically to our Maven repository. Last I checked, Tycho did not
fully support resolution of OSGi/P2 dependencies from Maven
repositories. Can you explain what artifacts are deployed to and how
they are consumed from the
can reference. That release
record needs to include plan information.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Requirements#State_intent_early_.28M4.29
Wayne
On 12/18/2013 07:23 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
@Wayne please update your records that m2e will participate in luna,
offset is +3
or +3 (in consideration of m2e-wtp)?
Wayne
On 12/18/2013 03:02 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
I created release record. You can find release plan.xml in our site git
repository
http://git.eclipse.org/c/www.eclipse.org/m2e.git/tree/plan.xml?id=6c18b3cf58143f5f462f2f3b601ef2996887ef07
--
Regards,
Igor
Wayne,
Which parts of m2e are required to carry incubating label, only
feature and bundles that *include* Aether and Sisu or everything that
makes use of Aether and Sisu (which is entire m2e)? I couldn't find any
wiki that explains how to brand projects that consume incubating components.
--
Wasn't there another deadline in February for new CQ submissions?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12/16/2013, 9:36, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com
mailto:i...@ifedorenko.com wrote:
On 12/16/2013, 4:16, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
On 15
, and I am sure that the Java and Java EE package maintainers
have a similar opinion.
Thanks,
Markus
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com
mailto:i...@ifedorenko.com wrote:
On 12/16/2013, 12:45, Wayne Beaton wrote:
The submission deadline
Hello,
I just pushed updated version of m2e 1.5 plan.xml to our git
repository [1]. I will let technology pmc and other eclipse powers
decide if this is good enough for m2e to stay in simultaneous release.
Also, in line with our use latest released maven recurring theme, we
updated m2e to
This was not about developers reviewing the changes. As I mentioned
upfront, I find gerrit very useful code review tool. I still believe
learning Gerrit is a berrier for prospect m2e contributors that are not
familiar with it. As long as m2e is not forced to accept contributions
through Gerrit, I
m2e has no plans to accept gerrit contributions, at least not for now.
Having gerring enabled for m2e will be confusing.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-10-04 10:22 AM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I almost wonder if we should just enable Gerrit for all projects. That's
what we do internally here for all
enablement? The commiters? The contributors? Why? Do you think gerrit
itself is confusing?
On 04/10/2013 6:08 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
m2e has no plans to accept gerrit contributions, at least not for now.
Having gerring enabled for m2e will be confusing.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-10-04 10:22
Yes. Patches attached to bugzilla are easier.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-10-04 12:25 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 10/04/2013 06:08 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
m2e has no plans to accept gerrit contributions, at least not for now.
I'm curious: Why is this so? Did you find a process that makes
Speaking of b3 editor, am I the only one who can't change feature
categories in kepler aggregator? I've opened 414269 several weeks ago,
still waiting for any response.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=414269
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-13 12:27 PM, David M Williams wrote:
I
remove the plugin, if you want to be absolutely sure
installation count is never reported. (and you probably want to stop
using p2 because it always reports installation stats).
--
Regards,
Igor
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/09/2013 01:14, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
As you may or may
On 2013-09-05 4:00 AM, Markus Alexander Kuppe wrote:
On 09/05/2013 02:14 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
* There will be workspace preference to enable the counting, it will be
on by default.
Does this mean that the plug-in collects statistics even if the user
does not opt-in to send stats
provide a link to the policy?
--
Regards,
Igor
Wayne
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=413169
On 09/05/2013 07:44 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
On 2013-09-05 4:00 AM, Markus Alexander Kuppe wrote:
On 09/05/2013 02:14 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
* There will be workspace
in the preferences?
The right answer _might_ be that we permit plug-ins to just send a
heartbeat without providing any ability to opt-out. My sense is that
this has potential to set off a tremendous backlash.
Or maybe I'm just being stupid and paranoid.
Wayne
On 09/05/2013 12:11 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote
, if not a few months.
Wayne
On 09/05/2013 12:54 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
You didn't answer my question. When do you expect to have decision on
this new policy?
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org
Learn about Eclipse Projects http
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 2:15 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] proposal: active eclipse installation count
service
As you may or may not know, p2 can be configured to report
As you may or may not know, p2 can be configured to report feature or
plugin download stats to a remote server [1]. As a side note, this
reporting is done silently, i.e., without telling the user, and both
installations from remote servers and local filesystem are reported.
I would like to
...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:26 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pre-M1 Aggregation Repository
Is this really
I did the same, too. I simply don't have the time needed to maintain
list of project-level repositories and will build against kepler until I
can switch to luna simrel repo.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-21 4:05 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote:
Maybe it would help if project could publish a (stable) URL
against the bits that will
appear with your bits in this round's simrel repo. Doesn't that open up
the potential for bad things?
Doug.
On 13-08-21 7:29 AM, Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com wrote:
I did the same, too. I simply don't have the time needed to maintain
list of project-level
, but it will make such strategy less fraught with problems.
- Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:36 AM
To: cross-project-issues-dev
for what yearly release.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-21 3:47 PM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com
mailto:ifedore...@sonatype.com wrote:
Again, I am not arguing against building with individual dependency
repositories. All I am
don't want to just
pickup the random newest version. That's a lot more work.
- Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:55 PM
of the SR?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
*From: *Igor Fedorenko
*Sent: *Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:24 AM
*To: *cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
*Reply To: *Cross project issues
*Subject: *Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release
review
Is new
Is new releases must be released a month before SR RC1 a new requirement?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-14 6:53 PM, David M Williams wrote:
I'll take this topic as a good segue to summarize Planning Council's
view on more frequent releases and including new features in SRs.
I'll try to keep in
Can you elaborate? Using m2e as an example, what repositories am I
supposed to use to resolve jdt, xml editor and emf dependencies needed
to build m2e Luna M1?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-14 7:33 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Nope. If you need that ... sounds like you are doing something wrong
I am not sure I understand the expected process for projects that have
their dependencies disabled in the aggregator. Are we supposed to check
from time to time to see when dependencies become enabled or there is a
way to tell b3 aggregator enable contribution when all prereqs are
available?
--
On 2013-07-30 5:52 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
And seriously what again is Standard vs Java vs Java EE ?
I agree with that point. I'd rather see those 3 ones replaced with a
general Java and JEE package. It seems to make total sense with the
current status of Java development use-cases.
Are
How is this going to help? In most/all cases bugs are not fixed because
nobody comes forward with quality fixes. Weather somebody says it needs
to be fixed does not matter unless his/her words are backed up by the
code.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-07-12 11:50 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
Get a
integrity; sometimes that annoys people.In any case,
we're not obligated to spend every waking moment of every day to fix
every reported problem, though it sometimes feels that way
Regards,
Ed
On 12/07/2013 7:26 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
How is this going to help? In most/all cases bugs
I don't think this is a workable approach.
First, such a test needs to run on all supported platform and jvm
combinations, which makes already involved task pretty much impossible
to perform, at least for small dev teams like we have in m2e.
Second, this won't actually find interoperability
I agree, one year is way too long. I am not even sure 6 months is often
enough. We had three m2e releases between Juno and Kepler, and I
consider m2e mature, (relatively) low-activity project. At the same
time, I never use R builds myself, I always use M-builds as primary
development environment
-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of Igor Fedorenko
[ifedore...@sonatype.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:49 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 6 month release cycle
I agree, one year is way too long. I am not even sure 6 months is often
enough
See how we do this in m2e
https://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e/m2e-core.git/tree/pom.xml?id=releases/1.3/1.3.1.20130219-1424#n207
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-04-09 9:05 AM, Ahmed Wafa wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm sorry if this was discussed somewhere. I wanted to ask how can I
sign jars generated from a
From the log it appears the build is trying to access Maven Central
repository directly but this connection times out for whatever reason.
Check if your firewall allows this connection or if you need to
configure http proxy, for example
http://maven.apache.org/settings.html#Proxies
--
Regards,
Is there special product/component or something else I need to set on
the bug to get webmaster's attention? The wiki says open a bug that
blocks bug 324116. I did that for m2e few weeks ago, but nothing happened.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-10-10 12:46 PM, Henrik Rentz-Reichert wrote:
Hi Igor,
for
toolchain.xml must be available on slave in ~/.m2 directory. You can
find sample toolchain.xml and libraries that correspond to restricted
execution environments attached to bug 386649 [1]. Beware that there is
currently an outstanding issue with IBM JDKs tracked as bug 389856 [2]
[1]
for the toolchains.xml file, but I don't know how to specify
this switch to the hudson build.
Laurent
[1]
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Modeling/job/emf-compare-master/326/console
[2] https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Modeling/job/emf-compare-master/
On 25/09/2012 13:14, Igor Fedorenko
for the webmasters to add the toolchains.xml file to the correct
location, I can raise a bugzilla for this if the answer to both
questions is yes (i.e. it will not impact any existing build) :).
Laurent
On 25/09/2012 15:00, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
You need to create toolchain.xml in ~/.m2
FYI, this does not currently produce usable pack200 files due to
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387557
--
Regards,
Igor
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Igor Fedorenko
ifedore...@sonatype.com wrote:
I deployed the new eclipse jarsigner plugin to [1]. This is not ideal,
but I
for all your jars, so, if it it is only on the
nested jars it is failing, you might try writing them with Java 6 as a
test? And/or, seems the general advise from bug 361628 is to set
jarprocessor.exclude.children=true
in your ellipse.inf file.
HTH
From: Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com
just found it interesting that someone was using it. Good to know.
From: Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 08/19/2012 07:36 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [keplerAggregation] Failed for
build 2012-08-18_16-50-43
Sent by: cross
? And/or, seems the general advise from bug 361628 is to set
jarprocessor.exclude.children=true
in your ellipse.inf file.
HTH
From: Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com
To: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 08/18/2012 11:16 PM
Subject: Re
Agrregator build still fails so I disabled m2e contribution.
--
Regards,
Igor
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com wrote:
I rebuilt everything using java6 and published new 1.2.0.20120819-1116
repo. I also removed all previous m2e 1.2 repos to avoid any
of m2e bundles and invalidates jar file
signature while doing that.
--
Regards,
Igor
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Igor Fedorenko ifedore...@sonatype.com wrote:
Agrregator build still fails so I disabled m2e contribution.
--
Regards,
Igor
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Igor Fedorenko
I just updated m2e contribution to Juno SR1 to version 1.2.0, up from
1.1.0 shipped in SR0. Nothing on the train depends on m2e as far as I
know, so I don't expect this change to cause any problem. But if you see
anything weird... you know who to blame ;-)
--
Regards,
Igor
Short term it maybe faster to deploy eclipse-signing-maven-plugin to one
of existing maven forgers, like oss.sonatype.org we run, and use it from
there. At least this is what I plan to do for the new signing plugin I
wrote for cbi build.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-08-15 9:15 AM, Markus Tiede wrote:
I know I probably asked this last year... and the year before last
too... but how do I enable a project?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-08-14 5:08 PM, David M Williams wrote:
But, that still leaves 49 to go!
Remember, next week we will be producing Kepler M1 as well as Juno SR1
RC1 ... all Monday
Can we do this now or should we wait until next week?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-06-21 12:20 PM, Ian Skerrett wrote:
All,
We have added a new market on Marketplace called Eclipse Juno Projects.
This will make it a lot easier for people to find the Juno projects in
the the Marketplace Client.
I am sorry if this is a question with an obvious answer but who is
supposed reader audience for the release review documents and what
they expect to find in the docs?
--
Regards,
Igor
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
I believe these expired certificates cause P2 to download both pack.gz
and jar flavours of the same artifact when Eclipse is running on SUN
Java 7. At least this is the behaviour I see with Juno M7 P2 runtime
included with Tycho. Don't know if newer P2 behaves differently or if
the problem is
hide details for Igor Fedorenko ---05/26/2012 06:30:42 PM---I
believe these expired certificates cause P2 to download Igor Fedorenko
---05/26/2012 06:30:42 PM---I believe these expired certificates cause
P2 to download both pack.gz and jar flavours of the same
From: Igor Fedorenko ifedore
Tycho 0.13 and newer generate optional/non-greedy p2 requirements, which
I believe is the new behaviour.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-05-25 2:19 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
Martin,
Many thanks for this.
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but how do we know what publisher
we're using? We're using
License feature support is coming in soon to be released Tycho 0.14...
assuming I properly understood how it is supposed to work, of course.
I'd appreciate if somebody tried current Tycho 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT and
provided feedback in the bugzilla or on tycho-dev mailing list.
git seems to be back, but download.eclipse.org is still down (both
became unavailable for me at about the same time).
Unable to connect to repository
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/indigo/compositeContent.jar
Operation timed out
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-01-18 1:04 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
with download.eclipse.org...
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/download.eclipse.org
On 01/18/2012 01:08 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
git seems to be back, but download.eclipse.org is still down (both
became unavailable for me at about the same time).
Unable to connect to repository
http://download.eclipse.org
PM, Denis Roy wrote:
Can anyone trace what it's actually trying to fetch?
On 01/18/2012 01:16 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Denis,
download.eclipse.org front page maybe up, but I can't install anything
from indigo release repository. Get the same timout from two different
locations, one in Canada
Works for me now. Thank you for the quick fix.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-01-18 1:29 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
Hmmm, looks like Georgia Tech isn't responding. I've redirected these to
OSU OSL instead. Does it work now?
On 01/18/2012 01:22 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
http://download.eclipse.org/releases
I hoped to contribute new m2e version to Indigo SR2, but aggregator
build seems to be broken for last couple of weeks [1]. Did I miss the
last chance to be in SR2 already?
[1]
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/indigo.runAggregator/
--
Regards,
Igor
I am following instructions on [1] to validate Juno aggregation with b3
Aggregator Editor and MDT/OCL fails with
Unable to load repository http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/ocl
/updates/milestones/4.0.0
Is this expected? Apart from removing MDT/OCL, is there anything I can
do to make
79 matches
Mail list logo
