On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Ralf Sternberg
rsternb...@eclipsesource.com wrote:
I don't know about the SRs but I remember that EGit updated from 1.3
to 2.0 in Juno RC2 or RC3. For me this feels like a pretty risky
change for an RC. I don't mean to point the finger at EGit, I just
think
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Ed Willink e...@willink.me.uk wrote:
Hi
I think a certain amount of self-policing is possible for the many 'minor'
projects. Their consumers are surely well aware how stable builds are and
how much credible development is going on. Concerned projects should
I don't know about the SRs but I remember that EGit updated from 1.3
to 2.0 in Juno RC2 or RC3. For me this feels like a pretty risky
change for an RC. I don't mean to point the finger at EGit, I just
think we should agree that RC1 should really be a release candidate,
i.e. almost the thing that
:06/07/2013 09:40 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information
for some Kepler projects
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hi,
Contributing DLTK 5.0 and removing 4.0 at the very last minute (RC3) to
the Kepler repo
Hi,
I've finally managed to updated DLTK contribution to the latest build.
When it will be picked up by the release process, to verify the results?
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jacek Pospychała
jacek.pospych...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
PDT has been building and testing
issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 06/06/2013 08:36 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information
for some Kepler projects
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hi,
I've finally managed to updated DLTK contribution
Hi,
we would like to have RTP dropped form the release train. I will delete the b3
aggregator file today. Thansk in advance.
Cheers Holger
On May 10, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Jacek Pospychała jacek.pospych...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi,
PDT has been building and testing against DLTK-nightly builds
hi,
PDT has been building and testing against DLTK-nightly builds for last
months, so we prefer DLTK 5.0.
thanks,
Jacek
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alexey Panchenko
alex.panche...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately The DLTK team were quite busy this year with other projects.
Initially
I am now only missing the information for the DLTK and Runtime
Packaging (RTP) project. I have contacted DLTK via their mailing
list; Ian has contacted the RTP project leaders directly (thanks,
Ian).
I noticed that DLTK is contributing their 4.0 release build (from
We're getting closer. I've been able to remove a few entries from
this list.
I'm still missing release version records/declarations from a few
projects.
Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK)
Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF)
Eclipse Communication Framework
and on again - The IT Crowd
Title: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information for some Kepler projects
We're getting closer. I've been able to remove a few entries from
this list.
I'm still missing release version records/declarations from a few
projects
I am missing release information for the following projects that
have declared intent to participate in Kepler.
C/C++ Development Tools (CDT)
Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK)
Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF)
Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF)
Runtime
12 matches
Mail list logo
