On 12/20/2012 09:53 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Normally having two versions wouldn't hurt anything, unless you know
there's some API change or something that makes them incompatible
Requiring 2 different versions of a feature which contain some
singleton bundles (ie that define some extensions
Hi
I just noticed (I wasn't subscribed to the dev list until this morning),
the m2e-wtp features are missing from
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/staging/
I pushed
http://git.eclipse.org/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build.git/commit/?id=6ccc7333262b939e27e6bd370007253f3b737af9late
on wed.
/Simultaneous_Release_Requirements
and other useful information.
Welcome to Kepler!
From: Fred Bricon fbri...@gmail.com
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 12/21/2012 05:18 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for
Kepler M4 +3
Sent by:cross
: 12/21/2012 03:01 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for
Kepler M4 +3
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
On 12/20/2012 09:53 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Normally having two versions wouldn't hurt anything, unless you know
there's some
Hi,
I will handle the soa.bpel warning before this evening.
Cheers,
Vincent.
Le 19/12/2012 22:51, David M Williams a crit:
It is almost 5 PM
(Eastern) and not heard
anyone ask for "wait" ... though
Done.
However, I made a Git merge. I just hope I did not break anything.
:|
Vincent.
Le 20/12/2012 15:05, Vincent Zurczak a crit:
Hi,
I will handle the soa.bpel warning before this evening.
Thanks Vincent!bob
Hi,
I will handle the soa.bpel warning before this evening.
Cheers,
Vincent.
Le 19/12/2012 22:51, David M Williams a écrit:
It is almost 5 PM
(Eastern) and not heard
anyone
Cool. Does this mean we are ready for Kepler M4?
Done.
However, I made a Git merge. I just hope I did not break anything.
:|
Vincent.
Le 20/12/2012 15:05, Vincent Zurczak a écrit:
Hi,
I
David,
I was certain that I'd already updated EclipseLink, but that was not the case.
I double checked this morning on a whim due to this thread, and discovered the
issue. You are using our M5, but our build was still set to M4. That would
leave two sets of jars in the aggregation. I've just
:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for
Kepler M4 +3
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
David,
I was certain that I'd already updated EclipseLink, but that was not the
case. I double checked this morning on a whim due to this thread, and
discovered
.
Signed-off-by: vzurczak vincent.zurc...@petalslink.com
From: Vincent Zurczak vincent.zurc...@linagora.com
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 12/20/2012 09:35 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for
Kepler M4 +3
Sent by:cross-project
Le 20/12/2012 18:44, David M Williams a écrit :
This commit, did break aggregation. The reason is you removed the
feature from your file, but its still listed in the SOA
Development Category. When ever features are added or removed, I
recommend using the b3 aggregator editor. It often effects
can get what they need from your project's repo, I'd prefer
to go that route.
Thanks,
From: Eric Gwin eric.g...@oracle.com
To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 12/20/2012 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 +3
Sent
Eric Gwin eric.g...@oracle.com wrote on 12/20/2012 02:04:11 PM:
No. EclipseLink's M4 was 2.5.0.v20121016-ab08992, it is what was
included in the aggregation files. However, Dali is including
EclipseLink directly, and they are using M5 (2.5.0.v20121120-
ec51fcc). So currently both versions
It is almost 5 PM (Eastern) and not heard anyone ask for wait ... though
sounded implied by some messages here?
I do see that amp is completely disabled (at the repository level):
amp.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
These three projects have a feature or two disabled. Not sure if the
To: Cross project issues (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org)
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 +3
It is almost 5 PM (Eastern) and not heard anyone ask for wait ... though
sounded implied by some messages here?
I do see that amp is completely disabled
, December 19, 2012 1:51 PM
To: Cross project issues (cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org)
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 +3
It is almost 5 PM (Eastern) and not heard anyone ask for wait ... though
sounded implied by some messages here?
I do see that amp
17 matches
Mail list logo
