Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Wayne Beaton
I think that this is what I said. Wayne On 07/30/2014 03:48 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote: Simrel process should not require projects to declare a particular release version. Rather, the process should focus on the type of changes being contributed at a particular date. For instance, "you

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Konstantin Komissarchik
es-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package The primary intent behind a plan is to give potential contributors some sense of how they can contribute. I have no trouble putting you down for 2.2.1 for now with a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Wayne Beaton
The primary intent behind a plan is to give potential contributors some sense of how they can contribute. I have no trouble putting you down for 2.2.1 for now with an expectation that--should you receive contributions that warrant the creation of a new release--you'll create a new release reco

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Markus Knauer
Thanks for opening the EPP bug. b3aggrcon - that's probably the next bug that you should open against "Eclipse Foundation" > "Community" > "Cross-Project", or short: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Community&component=Cross-Project&short_desc=write%20access%20needed%20for%20or

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Mickael Istria
On 07/30/2014 08:24 PM, Markus Knauer wrote: Hi Mickael, about RCP package inclusion: The rcp-package component in Bugzilla would be the best place to open a bug and discuss if/how/... this can be included in the RCP/RAP package: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=EPP&compone

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Markus Knauer
Hi Mickael, about RCP package inclusion: The rcp-package component in Bugzilla would be the best place to open a bug and discuss if/how/... this can be included in the RCP/RAP package: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=EPP&component=rcp-package By coincidence I'm the maintainer

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Mickael Istria
On 07/30/2014 06:47 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote: Can I assume that you mean Mars? ;-) Sure, you can assume that ;) I've started assembling the list of projects/releases that will join Mars [0]. I'll put you down for 2.2.1 for now Thanks. if you do decide to include a different release with Mars,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Wayne Beaton
Can I assume that you mean Mars? ;-) I've started assembling the list of projects/releases that will join Mars [0]. I'll put you down for 2.2.1 for now; if you do decide to include a different release with Mars, then let us know on this list (before the M4 deadline) and I'll update the record.

[cross-project-issues-dev] Wish to contribute SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package

2014-07-30 Thread Mickael Istria
Hi all, SWTBot contributors would like to integrate SWTBot to Luna aggregator, and to PDE EPP package. Cf discussion https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/swtbot-dev/msg00618.html The initial contribution is SWTBot 2.2.1, which was released 4 months ago: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/t