I believe these expired certificates cause P2 to download both pack.gz
and jar flavours of the same artifact when Eclipse is running on SUN
Java 7. At least this is the behaviour I see with Juno M7 P2 runtime
included with Tycho. Don't know if newer P2 behaves differently or if
the problem is
Hi,
Am 24.05.2012 09:19, schrieb Dennis Hübner:
Sure there are greedy optional dependencies in the repository, because
it often just intended by projects. I don't understand, why are you
talking about *incorrect* greediness? Not a default it not the same as
wrong.
IMHO this [1] report is
Am 24.05.2012 11:33, schrieb Dennis Hübner:
You say must, is the last year default deprecated?
I think it's not explicitly deprecated. But it's legacy. ;)
However we have over 250 optional dependency entries in 53
bundles, instead of creating 53 p2.inf files I used the x-installation
On 05/24/2012 06:40 AM, David M Williams wrote:
Look at these reports:
http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/
Looking at verified.txt I see lots of
jar verified. Warning: This jar contains entries whose signer
certificate has expired. Re-run with the -verbose and -certs
Hello Gunnar,
Am 24.05.2012 um 12:18 schrieb Gunnar Wagenknecht:
Am 24.05.2012 11:33, schrieb Dennis Hübner:
You say must, is the last year default deprecated?
I think it's not explicitly deprecated. But it's legacy. ;)
@David It's not obligatory! So don't nag on project who use this
dennis.hueb...@itemis.de
To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 05/24/2012 03:19 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Yet another nag note ... and,
I mean it this time!
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hi David
On 05/24/2012 12:58 PM, Dennis Hübner wrote:
So it's a Use the new publisher thing… Is it obligatory for all eclipse
projects? Or is it just a good practice.
Adopters can still decide if an optional dependency should be installed or not, by filtering it from the build target
platform and
Am 24.05.2012 14:57, schrieb Thomas Hallgren:
One could very well argue that an optional non-greedy dependency is
completely useless and doesn't fulfill any other
purpose but documentation.
We have a bunch of bundles in place that have optional non-greedy
dependencies to allow flexibility at
On 05/24/2012 03:13 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 14:57, schrieb Thomas Hallgren:
One could very well argue that an optional non-greedy dependency is completely
useless and doesn't fulfill any other
purpose but documentation.
We have a bunch of bundles in place that have
On 05/24/2012 06:30 AM, Stephan Herrmann wrote:
On 05/24/2012 06:40 AM, David M Williams wrote:
Look at these reports:
http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/
Looking at verified.txt I see lots of
jar verified. Warning: This jar contains entries whose signer
certificate has
Stephan Herrmann wrote on 05/24/2012 06:30:51 AM:
Looking at verified.txt I see lots of
jar verified. Warning: This jar contains entries whose signer
certificate has expired. Re-run with the -verbose and -certs options
for more details.
It seems to fix this we'd have to re-build
: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Hallgren
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 3:37 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Yet another nag note ... and, I mean it
this time!
On 05/24/2012
12 matches
Mail list logo
