Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] eclipse.org web pages CVS to Git migration

2012-10-11 Thread Igor Vinnykov
Hi all, Henrik, thank you for the useful link. I've followed the provided instructions to submit the migration request. Can someone explain what will happen after a project website migration - will website content be displayed based on the Git data? Or it will be displayed based on the CVS

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] eclipse.org web pages CVS to Git migration

2012-10-11 Thread Henrik Rentz-Reichert
Hi Igor, I just confirmed with our project website. The content is already based on the new Git repository. I just pushed a change and the website was updated right away. -Henrik Am 11.10.2012 10:55, schrieb Igor Vinnykov:

[cross-project-issues-dev] eclipse.org web pages CVS to Git migration

2012-10-10 Thread Igor Vinnykov
Hello, There was an announcement about CVS repositories migration to Git. I have a question about Web resources stored in CVS. Maybe it was asked already, but I missed an answer, so would like to ask it once again. Background: Right now our project web pages are stored in CVS, so web

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] eclipse.org web pages CVS to Git migration

2012-10-10 Thread Henrik Rentz-Reichert
Hi Igor, for Web Pages it's very simple, really. Have a look at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Git/Migrating_to_Git#Migrating_Your_Project_Website I did that recently for our eTrice project. I opened a bug and the same day the Webmaster replied that all was done:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] eclipse.org web pages CVS to Git migration

2012-10-10 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Is there special product/component or something else I need to set on the bug to get webmaster's attention? The wiki says open a bug that blocks bug 324116. I did that for m2e few weeks ago, but nothing happened. -- Regards, Igor On 12-10-10 12:46 PM, Henrik Rentz-Reichert wrote: Hi Igor, for

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] eclipse.org web pages CVS to Git migration

2012-10-10 Thread Wayne Beaton
Perhaps I'm being too sensitive, but a few comments that I've read make me feel like this is a bit of a surprise. The migration of project repositories from CVS to Git has been going for months; I believe that we've been very vocal about this on numerous channels.