Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

l Message- From: cross-project-issues-dev On Behalf Of Christoph Läubrich Sent: den 19 april 2022 19:16 To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon > I would be very keen to allow Java 17 as BREE in S

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 15:07, Mickael Istria wrote: > > Eclipse IDE can currently run with JRE 11, but the vast majority of users > now do get JustJ from EPP packages; and that is currently Java 18. > > I assume the "Java 18" was just a typo - EPP is shipping withJava 17 and will be (at least) u

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:35 PM Torbjorn SVENSSON via cross-project-issues-dev wrote: > Hello, > Hi, > What you are talking about here is more or less requiring anyone using > SimRel to also move to a JRE 17. Not directly (SimRel can still use older versions of TM4E), but yes, I guess it can

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

-Original Message- > From: cross-project-issues-dev < > cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org> On Behalf Of Christoph > Läubrich > Sent: den 19 april 2022 19:16 > To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planni

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

t: den 19 april 2022 19:16 To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon > I would be very keen to allow Java 17 as BREE in SimRel by a project > that wants it. > PS Where is "SimRel targets Jav

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

> I would be very keen to allow Java 17 as BREE in SimRel by a project > that wants it. > PS Where is "SimRel targets Java 11" defined? Is it just implicit > at the moment (because Eclipse Platform is Java 11), I think there is at least no *technical* reason of this, as far as I know there are s

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

Thanks a lot Martin, it's indeed an annoyance. Is specifying a (older) Gradle version on project a common practice? How does it work in CLI if one uses a newer Gradle install to run some build that defines an older Gradle version? What are the chances that this bug gets fixed soon enough? (I'm goi

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

Hey! Thanks a lot for bringing this to the wider audience, much appreciated. I added a comment around a somewhat unpleasant consequence of an upgrade to JavaSE-17 as a minimal Java version: https://github.com/eclipse/tm4e/issues/339#issuecomment-1102875590

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM4E planning to start using JavaSE-17 as BREE soon

Thank you Mickael for starting this discussion. I would be very keen to allow Java 17 as BREE in SimRel by a project that wants it. I will endeavour to get the Planning Council to come to an agreement on this as I think that is the group in charge of such requirements. PS Where is "SimRel targets