Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Log4j 1.x vulnerability

2022-01-26 Thread Matthias Sohn
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 8:48 AM Christoph Läubrich wrote: > I think redirecting logging messages to the eclipse log would better be > done like SLF4j-osgi [1] > > What I really wonder is: Have these project really a hard > requirement/demand on using especially Log4J(1/2)? > > Why not using SLF4J

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Log4j 1.x vulnerability

2022-01-26 Thread Ed Willink
Hi On 26/01/2022 07:48, Christoph Läubrich wrote: Why not using SLF4J in all places and let the user choose the implementation with their favorite CVEs? Use of SLF4J has been suggested before and so I tried to be a good Eclipse citizen. My failed attempts are described in: https://bugs.ecli

[cross-project-issues-dev] Potential vulnerability in Apache Xerces 1.12.1 (CVE-2022-23437)

2022-01-26 Thread Wayne Beaton
>From CVE-2022-23437: There's a vulnerability within the Apache Xerces Java (XercesJ) XML parser > when handling specially crafted XML document payloads. This causes, the > XercesJ XML parser to wait in an infinite loop, which may sometimes consume > system resources for prolonged duration. This v

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Potential vulnerability in Apache Xerces 1.12.1 (CVE-2022-23437)

2022-01-26 Thread Nitin Dahyabhai
Wayne, I'll take it on. On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:02 PM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > From CVE-2022-23437: > > There's a vulnerability within the Apache Xerces Java (XercesJ) XML parser >> when handling specially crafted XML document payloads. This causes, the >> Xe

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Potential vulnerability in Apache Xerces 1.12.1 (CVE-2022-23437)

2022-01-26 Thread Nitin Dahyabhai
Of course, only now do I remember how much effort Aurélien had to go through just to get the then-current version onto Maven Central. On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:10 PM Nitin Dahyabhai wrote: > Wayne, > I'll take it on. > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:02 PM Wayne Beaton < > wayne.bea...@eclipse-found