Thanks for the summary. I would be curious to know what the arguments against
contributing source were… It seems to me that the status quo has led to
inconsistency, an antithesis to the point of having a common repository.
- Konstantin
From:
Konstantin,
I don't think there were specific arguments against contributing source
bundles -- we generally agreed that source bundles are a good thing. The
arguments were that the Planning Council should not make this a requirement
of the train. Overall there has been a movement to reduce the
I agree that it is desirable to minimize the number of must do rules and
those that are there should be enforced, but a should do regarding source
bundles would do a lot for projects who are frankly uncertain as to what
they should do in this area.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From:
I think this illustrates quite well the trouble of leaving such decisions to
projects, without even providing guidance as to what’s recommended.
It is too easy for projects to make too many assumptions about the audience
that is using the simrel repository. Note that I am not talking about
On 8/8/2013 9:53 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
I think this illustrates quite well the trouble of leaving such
decisions to projects, without even providing guidance as to what's
recommended.
I agree, but I think it also highlights
a) SR projects have different consumers...meaning
