Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread Matthias Sohn
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:08 AM, simone.seu...@sungard.com wrote: Hi everybody, ** ** because it is our first service release I just wanted to check if a service release is also processed like the yearly major release. Do we have to follow [1] and [2] or is there a different

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread David M Williams
I'll take this topic as a good segue to summarize Planning Council's view on more frequent releases and including new features in SRs. I'll try to keep in brief, but anyone is welcome to read my full notes of meeting at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/August_7_2013 First, it was

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ready for Luna (M1) aggregation ... and SR1 reminders

2013-08-14 Thread Marcel Bruch
Hi David, is there any chance we can get http://download.eclipse.org/releases/luna/ populated with the platform+jdt before m1? Thanks, Marcel On Aug 14, 2013, at 5:04 PM, David M Williams david_willi...@us.ibm.com wrote: Hi David, could you please update the corresponding google

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Is new releases must be released a month before SR RC1 a new requirement? -- Regards, Igor On 2013-08-14 6:53 PM, David M Williams wrote: I'll take this topic as a good segue to summarize Planning Council's view on more frequent releases and including new features in SRs. I'll try to keep in

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread Doug Schaefer
Yeah actually that doesn't make sense. Why have the release sit around for a month instead of fixing bugs in it right to the end of the SR? Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. From: Igor Fedorenko Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:24 AM To:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread David M Williams
Its new as of last April. And, by all means ... fix bugs and then submit a maintenance release for final version (which would not need a new release). Released, in this context, means the formal Eclipse process of having been through the required release review which is always required of

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ready for Luna (M1) aggregation

2013-08-14 Thread Greg Watson
Does anyone know if CDT will be enabled for M1? We can't enable PTP without CDT. Thanks, Greg On Aug 9, 2013, at 10:06 AM, David M Williams david_willi...@us.ibm.com wrote: I hope everyone has enjoyed their summer vacations ... but now back to work! :) We do have a preliminary schedule

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ready for Luna (M1) aggregation ... and SR1 reminders

2013-08-14 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Can you elaborate? Using m2e as an example, what repositories am I supposed to use to resolve jdt, xml editor and emf dependencies needed to build m2e Luna M1? -- Regards, Igor On 2013-08-14 7:33 PM, David M Williams wrote: Nope. If you need that ... sounds like you are doing something wrong

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ready for Luna (M1) aggregation ... and SR1 reminders

2013-08-14 Thread David M Williams
What I typically do, is follow the 'dev list' of the projects we rely on. There, most projects announce where particular builds or repos are and when ready. And, if not, you can ask there. Such as for Eclipse, we always announce on several lists, one being 'eclipse-dev'

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ready for Luna (M1) aggregation ... and SR1 reminders

2013-08-14 Thread Marcel Bruch
Wouldn't say need :-) Recommenders 2.0 milestones is enabled. On Aug 14, 2013, at 5:33 PM, David M Williams david_willi...@us.ibm.com wrote: Nope. If you need that ... sounds like you are doing something wrong :) From:Marcel Bruch marcel.br...@codetrails.com To:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Decommissioning of maven.eclipse.org

2013-08-14 Thread Thanh Ha
Woops apparently I misread my calendar, I meant to say *August* 30th 2013. Thanh On 14/08/13 03:04 PM, Thanh Ha wrote: Hi Everyone, Per bug 405750 [1] I'd like to take a look into decommissioning maven.eclipse.org soon. We now have repo.eclipse.org and several projects have already been

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread Scott Lewis
On 8/14/2013 3:15 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: I don't remember that being the decision. Another thing that doesn't work with projects that want to ship more often and want to update the corresponding EPP package with that release. At the risk of overstating things, I don't think the Planning

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Question on Kepler SR1 release review

2013-08-14 Thread Konstantin Komissarchik
I tend to agree with this. A more representative simrel governance body would be leads of all participating projects. - Konstantin From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Scott Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August