Hi Christopher,
The Eclipse Subversive project committers are no longer able to support the
project. I assume that the existing code base will work with the Eclipse
Photon release since it's currently being included in builds. AFAICT, it's
not included in any packages.
You are correct that,
Hi Wayne,
Could you summarize the Subversion SVN Team Provider situation? I looked
through my email logs and only found this, but I have a vague
recollection of there being more about the topic.
On 12/15, Wayne wrote:
The *Eclipse Subversive* team has indicated that they can no longer
Thanks Fred. I've converted the Mylyn jobs.
Sam
--
Sam Davis
Senior Software Engineer, Tasktop
Committer, Eclipse Mylyn
http://tasktop.com
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Frederic Gurr <
frederic.g...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I was referring to jobs that have "Cascading
I haven't read the whole thread.
But I think it's fairly common sense that one should not use internal api
by an external project. It's just one of life's axioms.
It's like people who use reflection to get to private members of a java
class and deploy that code into production.
That's just a
Greetings folks.
It's crunch time. At EOB tomorrow (Friday), we're going to disable the
aggregation files for those projects that have not opted into Photon.
Specifically, we're going to disable:
- Eclipse EGerrit
- Eclipse Sphinx
- Eclipse Target Management
- Eclipse Orion
-
> I say that, as long as existing internals can be used, they are de facto API.
That is incorrect and the current meaning is well defined. See
x-internal description in the help
https://help.eclipse.org/mars/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.platform.doc.isv%2Freference%2Fmisc%2Fbundle_manifest.html
Ed,
My answers below
> I think that this is the path paved with good intentions.
Sure it is. I wish for the peace in world (even if it is the road to Hell) :)
> We'll need to start at the bottom, in the Equinox runtime. For example,
> we'll need to change a great many things in p2 before PDE
> Le 25 janv. 2018 à 10:22, Lars Vogel a écrit :
>
> > Should we change our policy and stop exporting new internal packages so
> > that they really cannot be used?
>
> -2, we want to enable extenders to use and explore code before making it API.
> IMHO a good way to
Hi all,
As you may have seen on some other thread, build with latest release of
Tycho with Platform M5 product (sdk, ide...) in target-platform can result
in the following error:
[ERROR] Cannot resolve target definition:
[ERROR] Software being installed: org.eclipse.platform.ide
This should be announced to this list.
Dani
From: Mickael Istria
To: Cross project issues
Date: 25.01.2018 11:19
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Latest platform I-builds
requiring Java 9?
Sent by:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Pierre-Charles David <
pierre-charles.da...@obeo.fr> wrote:
> Does this mean that the Photon M5 platform build of tomorrow can not be
> consumed without switching to a development version of Tycho for our own M5
> contributions? Unless the platform's M5
On 25/01/2018 10:24, Mickael Istria wrote:
Hi,
You'll need to use Tycho 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT to build against newer
milestones of Eclipse Platform, . Version 1.1.0 should be released
very soon with full Java 9 support.
If you can't migrate to newer Tycho, you can try this workaround which
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Pierre-Charles David
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a canary build in Sirius which consumes nightly builds of all our
> dependencies, including the platform.
First of all, kudos for doing that. I wish every project does so!
> It
Hi
For 'stable' projects such as JDT deprecating+hiding/promoting internal
may make sense, but it probably hides the code so that users in missding
the opportunity to abuse users also miss the opportunity to exploit in
other ways.
For 'evolving' projects such as Xtext, internal has provided
Hi,
You'll need to use Tycho 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT to build against newer milestones
of Eclipse Platform, . Version 1.1.0 should be released very soon with full
Java 9 support.
If you can't migrate to newer Tycho, you can try this workaround which
consists in tweaking your .target file or
> Should we change our policy and stop exporting new internal packages so
that they really cannot be used?
-2, we want to enable extenders to use and explore code before making it
API. IMHO a good way to provide new API is by having it already been
explored by users.
> And for existing internal
Mikaël,
I think that this is the path paved with good intentions.
We'll need to start at the bottom, in the Equinox runtime. For example,
we'll need to change a *great many *things in p2 before PDE works again;
we'll also need to change many things in p2 so that Oomph works again,
we'll
Hi all,
We have a canary build in Sirius which consumes nightly builds of all
our dependencies, including the platform. It started failing 2 days ago
[1] with:
[ERROR] Cannot resolve target definition:
[ERROR] Software being installed: org.eclipse.platform.ide
4.8.0.I20180122-2000
[ERROR]
Very interesting thread, thanks to all for sharing your opinion.
Changing existing internals could break clients because so far, they can use
it. Should we change our policy and stop exporting new internal packages so
that they really cannot be used? And for existing internal that one wants to
19 matches
Mail list logo