@Christian
Good to hear that you are moving to Import-Package! The fragment in the
current configuration can actually not be simply fixed with a drop-in
replacement as your version bounds are too strict. With that configuration
it won't be ever possible to exchange to a newer bugfix version. I woul
Hi,
I got in contact with the reload4j team. They changed the
Bundle-SymbolicName to org.apache.log4j and fixed several OSGi meta data
related issues in the meanwhile. Today they published 1.2.19 which should
work as a drop-in replacement in Eclipse based applications where
Require-Bundle was used
problem being fixed in
> 1.2.19 a fact and even if its a fact if it would be a fact that matters...
>
> Regards,
> Ed
>
> On 08.02.2022 15:48, Dirk Fauth via cross-project-issues-dev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got in contact with the reload4j team. They changed the
>
dle org.apache.log4j to Orbit
> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190574
> feel free to change this if someone finds out how to use EBR to only sign
> the upstream artefact.
> -Matthias
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:04 PM Dirk Fauth via cross-project-issues-dev <
>
I really like the idea. But what about jar signatures? When I brought up
the topic for reload4j I was told that the jars need to be signed in order
to be included. Is this taken care of?
Aleksandar Kurtakov schrieb am Di., 5. Apr. 2022,
13:48:
> Hey everyone,
> With PGP signing support, latest T
@Aleks
Maybe jetty is already signed correctly? How will be the process for
unsigned content?
Christoph Läubrich schrieb am Di., 5. Apr. 2022,
13:54:
> > When Maven Central is not OSGi artifact Orbit will be preferred.
>
> I can only encourage everyone to open a ticket for such project and he
-wg/eclipseide.org/-/issues/11
>
> On 05.04.2022 13:57, Dirk Fauth via cross-project-issues-dev wrote:
>
> @Aleks
> Maybe jetty is already signed correctly? How will be the process for
> unsigned content?
>
>
> Christoph Läubrich schrieb am Di., 5. Apr. 2022,
> 13:54:
Well, with the Generic Editor available I recently dropped all tpd files.
Now I edit the target files via Generic Editor and also have code
completion. That is now similar comfortable.
But I think Oomph does not yet support the new Maven location.
Michael Keppler schrieb am Di., 5. Apr. 2022,
20
I totally understand the statements and even share the frustration in other
places. For example I really liked Gerrit and the contribution process, and
now I am kind of forced to move to the GitHub process. Still need to figure
out how and when I will be able to do so.
For the oomph thing, IIRC on
