Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse IDE 2024-06 Project Participation Page
Hi Wayne, for Eclipse DLTK it will be 6.4.1 (just for API compatibility) https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.dltk/releases/6.4.1 Thanks -- Dawid Pakuła On May 22 2024, at 11:56 PM, Wayne Beaton via cross-project-issues-dev wrote: > > > Greetings folks! > > > > I've assembled the release information for participating projects here > (https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/2024-06). > > > > > Note that the list of projects reflects our long time practice of only > including projects whose teams are actively participating in the simultaneous > release. If you look hard enough, you'll notice that projects that have been > "sponsored in" by participating projects are absent from the list. This is > per the requirements. I expect that these requirements will change in some > future release. > > > > > A lot of the releases are quite old, and based on the activity in the > simrel.build (https://github.com/eclipse-simrel/simrel.build) repository, > at least a few projects need to create some release records, and some may > need to engage in a progress review (I've done my usual thing of making by > best guess based on the release records in the system). > > > > If your project is contributing a different release than what you see here, > please ensure that you've created a release record > (https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#pmi-commands-release), and let me > know. If your project has not engaged in a progress (or release) review > (https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#progress-review) in more than > one year, please engage with the EMO ASAP to schedule a review. > > > > > Be sure to set the New and Noteworthy URL in your release record: it is > through this relationship that we build the aggregate N&N. > > > > > Please make sure that you've made your best effort to engage in the IP Due > Diligence Process for all third party content before you engage with the EMO > for review. Bear in mind that you should be engaging in the IP Due Diligence > Process (https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-third-party) on an > ongoing basis and that all releases (regardless of whether or not they > correspond with a progress or release review) must only contain content that > has been vetted through the due diligence process. With the Eclipse Dash > License Tool (https://github.com/eclipse/dash-licenses) and the ability to > use it to automatically create review requests, it should be easier than > ever before to engage (the README has extensive information on how to > engage, and does include some pointers for using it with Eclipse Tycho > (https://github.com/eclipse/dash-licenses#eclipse-tycho)-based builds). > Connect with the EMO if you need assistance. > > > > > Here are some things that I've observed: > > > > > Eclipse Client Platform has been removed. > > > > The aggrcon files for the following projects are disabled; if any of these > projects are dropping from the release, please let me know: > > > > Eclipse Xpand > > > > Eclipse BPMN2 Modeler Project > > > > Eclipse RCPTT > > > > Let me know what I've missed. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wayne > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Wayne Beaton > > Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation > > > > > My working day may not be your working day! Please don’t feel obliged to read > or reply to this e-mail outside of your normal working hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Houston We Have a Problem
I'll prepare DLTK and PDT builds until end of this week On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:26 AM Ed Merks wrote: > FYI, > > If anyone else wants such tests, please ask me via direct email to avoid > so much traffic on this list. And *thanks *to those of you who have > already taken action and have asked for help directly! > > Christian, > > Both look good: > > > https://download.eclipse.org/oomph/archive/reports-extra/mwe/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/mwe/updates/nightly/index.html > > https://download.eclipse.org/oomph/archive/reports-extra/xtext/download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/nightly/index.html > > Thanks! > > On 16.11.2022 10:07, Christian Dietrich wrote: > > @Ed could you please give these two repos a test if we are fine: > https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/mwe/updates/nightly/ > https://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/nightly/ > > Thanks and kind regards, > Christian > > > Am 14.11.2022 um 13:43 schrieb Ed Merks: > > Recent versions of Java, including the most recent Java 17 release, now > consider some jar-signed bundles to be unsigned. This affects all bundles > and features signed between January 1, 2019 and April 14, 2022 with the > Eclipse certificate available at that time. > > This is a *very *long list with many affected projects: > > > https://download.eclipse.org/oomph/archive/reports-extra/staging-2022-12/download.eclipse.org/staging/2022-12/index.html > > The Platform has resigned their problematic bundles already: > > > https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator/issues/661 > > Orbit too has resigned the problematic bundles: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=581039 > > But the Orbit repo with the resigned bundles is *NOT *the one used by the > Platform for their M3 contribution and is not the one you/we should be > using for M3 which is this one: > > > https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20221109014815/repository > > *These projects need to do new builds*: > >- *org.eclipse.acceleo* >- *org.eclipse.bpmn2* >- *org.eclipse.dltk* >- *org.eclipse.ecf* >- *org.eclipse.eef* >- *org.eclipse.emf.edapt* >- *org.eclipse.emf.parsley* >- *org.eclipse.fx* >- *org.eclipse.gmf* >- *org.eclipse.mylyn* >- *org.eclipse.uml2* > > You should *ensure that the qualifiers of your bundles and features are > newer than 2021-04*, so that you don't have two the "same artifacts" but > with different signatures, which is especially important if you are doing > baseline replacement in your build. I can help test your repository if you > need help. Please reach out to me. > > *Everyone **needs to ensure that they consume from the next RC1 version > of Orbit*, otherwise we are likely to end up with massive duplicate Orbit > bundles and that is likely to cause problems. > > I hope someone from Mylyn is paying attention! > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=581029 > > > > Meanwhile, I'm trying to enable PGP signing of the bundles and features > with this poor certificates to "repair" them. But, Tycho does appear to > detect that a signature will be ignored, provides no way to specify how to > treat artifacts that already have a PGP signature (it actually produces > duplicate properties in the artifacts.xml), and it appears the PGP > signatures for features are invalid, so I'm not sure I'll be 100% > successful in finding a workaround. The following might be the best I can > do on your behalf unless the PGP feature signing issue is fixed: > > > https://download.eclipse.org/oomph/archive/reports-extra/2022-12-gpg/download.eclipse.org/staging/2022-12-gpg/index.html > > Note that in this scenario, I am *adding *the sim-bot PGP key/signature > in addition to the key/signature already present from the project. So all > PGP-signed bundles will generally have two PGP signatures, and in this > exceptional case, the bundle is jar-signed and has two PGP signatures: > > > https://download.eclipse.org/oomph/archive/reports-extra/2022-12-gpg/download.eclipse.org/staging/2022-12-gpg/index/bcpg_1.72.0.html > > With PGP-signed features, p2 fails to validate them making them impossible > to download/install, so in this case the cure is worse than the disease: > > > https://download.eclipse.org/oomph/archive/reports-extra/2022-12-gpg-bad/download.eclipse.org/staging/2022-12-gpg-bad/index/org.eclipse.acceleo.equinox.launcher.feature.jar_3.7.11.202102190929.html > > Perhaps this issue can be fixed in the coming days... > > Regards, > Ed > > > > > > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing listcross-project-issues-...@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, > Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann > Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: M
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2020-06 Release
Mylyn is part of PHP package, so because I often switching my production environment to M2 it’s at least partially tested. I’m using tasks and mylyn working sets. From time to time also contexts. — Dawid Pakuła On 27 May 2020 at 20:42:48, Wayne Beaton ( wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org) wrote: Updated! Regarding the list that I included at the start of this thread... Is anybody actually testing whether or not these simultaneous release participants actually function on the current version of the platform? Eclipse Tools for Cloud Foundry (2018) Eclipse BIRT (2017) Eclipse Mylyn (2018) Eclipse WindowBuilder (early 2019) Eclipse Xpand (2016) Eclipse Remote Systems Explorer (2018) Eclipse EMFStore (2017) Eclipse BPMN2 Model (2018) Eclipse BPEL Designer (2018) Eclipse ACTF (2017) Wayne On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:53 AM Markus Knauer wrote: > Hi Wayne, > > it's the same for RAP... it should be 3.13. > The release record is now available at > https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.rap/releases/3.13.0 > > Thanks and regards, > Markus > > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 02:28, Jeff Johnston wrote: > >> Hi Wayne, >> >> Linux Tools should be 7.7.0 for 2020-06. I had thought I had created the >> release record, but I was mistaken. Anyway, it is created now. >> >> -- Jeff J. >> >> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:44 PM Wayne Beaton < >> wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: >> >>> I've updated the records based on feedback. >>> >>> If you have not done so, please review the list and let me know if >>> something isn't right. >>> >>> https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/2020-06 >>> >>> Wayne >>> >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59 AM Wayne Beaton < >>> wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey folks! >>>> >>>> I've created the record for the 2020-06 Simultaneous Release >>>> <https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/2020-06>. As usual, I've used >>>> the information that I have available to make my best guess at which >>>> version you're releasing. If I've got something wrong, please first make >>>> sure that you've created a release record with the right date and then let >>>> me know to update the corresponding entry on the release page. >>>> >>>> I noticed that several of the contributions are more than one year old >>>> (some of them significantly more). I don't believe that it's necessarily >>>> wrong to contribute stable content, but would like to make sure that >>>> somebody is periodically testing configurations that include these >>>> contributions to mitigate the risk that we ship broken content. >>>> >>>> Eclipse Tools for Cloud Foundry (2018) >>>> Eclipse BIRT (2017) >>>> Eclipse Mylyn (2018) >>>> Eclipse WindowBuilder (early 2019) >>>> Eclipse Xpand (2016) >>>> Eclipse Remote Systems Explorer (2018) >>>> Eclipse EMFStore (2017) >>>> Eclipse BPMN2 Model (2018) >>>> Eclipse BPEL Designer (2018) >>>> Eclipse ACTF (2017) >>>> >>>> Wayne >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Wayne Beaton >>>> >>>> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc. >>>> >>>> Join us at our virtual event: EclipseCon 2020 >>>> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/2020> - October 20-22 >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Wayne Beaton >>> >>> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc. >>> >>> Join us at our virtual event: EclipseCon 2020 >>> <https://www.eclipsecon.org/2020> - October 20-22 >>> ___ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >> ___ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> > > > -- > > ### > EclipseSource Group > Telefon: +49 721 664733-0 (UTC +1) > Telefax: +49 721 66473329 > > http://eclipsesource.com > > >
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2019-09 Simultaneous Release
Arghh I missed M2 due vacation. Can we add update PDT and DLTK version during M3 or is too late? -- Dawid Pakuła - w3des.net On 27 Aug 2019, 19:12 +0200, Wayne Beaton , wrote: > Unfortunately, the aggrcon file doesn't consistently tell me what version > you're including in the release, so I usually just guess based on the date of > the release record. In any case, I believe that it's correct right now. > > FWIW, the reference to the release is by reference to the release record. > Changes in the release record will automatically be reflected on the > simultaneous release page. > > Wayne > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Leif Geiger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > as correctly stated on the participation page, Eclipse Marketplace Client > > > will participate in the release. But our version number will be 1.8.0 > > > instead of 1.7.7. We had updated the aggrcon file and created a > > > corresponding release record a while ago. Did we miss something or was > > > that just not updated on the participation page? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Leif > > > > > > From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > > On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton > > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:43 PM > > > To: Cross project issues > > > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2019-09 Simultaneous Release > > > > > > I've updated the 2019-09 participation page based on the information > > > available. A great many projects (26 at this point in time) have not yet > > > indicated that they are participating in the release. The instructions > > > are here. > > > > > > The opt-in deadline was August 9. > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:18 PM Wayne Beaton > > > wrote: > > > > I have updated the participation page with the information that I have > > > > available. Let me know if I've got anything wrong. > > > > > > > > Per the Simultaneous Release participation rules, every participating > > > > project needs to signal their continued participation by making a > > > > change (any change) to the project's aggrcon file. If your contribution > > > > will be a new release of your content, you must also create a release > > > > record. The date on the release record should be the date of the > > > > release (2019-09-18); when I add your project to the list, I pick the > > > > release record with a date on or before the date of the Simultaneous > > > > Release. > > > > > > > > Note that changes made the Eclipse Development Process require a > > > > release review (and IP Log review) only if the release is major or > > > > minor and your project has not done a release review in the past year. > > > > As always, service releases do not require a review. Do note, however, > > > > that you are still required to have all of your intellectual property > > > > fully vetted and cleared by the IP Team before it can be included in > > > > any release (regardless of whether or not you engage in a review). > > > > > > > > I'll check again and update the participation list accordingly next > > > > week. The opt-in deadline is M2, so after tomorrow... you're late. > > > > > > > > Thanks for your attention. > > > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:00 PM Wayne Beaton > > > > wrote: > > > > > Don't panic yet. I start to build this list in earnest around the M2 > > > > > mark. > > > > > > > > > > I'll make sure that Eclipse Web Tools makes the list. > > > > > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:50 PM Nitin Dahyabhai > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Is there cause for concern at how brief the list at > > > > > > https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/2019-09 (and that WTP isn't > > > > > > there, > > > > > > although I'm pretty sure we should be)? Or just a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nitin Dahyabhai > > > > > > WTP PMC Lead > > > > > > nit...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > >
[cross-project-issues-dev] PDT 6.1 participation in 2018.09
Hi, The PDT project will participate in 2018.09 SimRel. Offset: +3 Release record: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/6.1 — Dawid Pakuła ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] DLTK 5.10 participation in 2018.09
Hi, The DLTK project will participate in 2018.09 SimRel. Offset: +2 Release record: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.dltk/releases/5.10 — Dawid Pakuła ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen.3 release is now available
Packages page still points to Oxygen.2 From: Frederic Gurr Reply: Cross project issues Date: 21 March 2018 at 15:25:12 To: Cross project issues Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen.3 release is now available Oxygen.3 is now available at the build-in repository at => https://download.eclipse.org/releases/oxygen/ EPP packages will be available at => https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/ Thanks to everybody who contributed to this release. Regards, Fred -- Frederic Gurr Release Engineer Eclipse Foundation ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled
Hi, I enabled DLTK and PDT, validation passed. -- Dawid Pakuła From: Kaloyan Raev Reply: Cross project issues Date: 31 January 2018 at 17:32:14 To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled Hi, I removed the DLTK integration with RSE from SimRel: https://git.eclipse.org/r/116449/ With this change it should be possible to re-enable DLTK and PDT. Thanks, Kaloyan On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Frederic Gurr < frederic.g...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > Hi, > > As announced before, the Target Management (TM) contribution has been > disabled. > > Even though some code has been moved to CDT (see > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=527575), there are still > two features remaining (org.eclipse.rse and org.eclipse.rse.useractions). > > Since disabling the TM contribution caused issues, I had to disable the > following contributions: > > * TCF > * PDT > * LDT > * DLTK > > Please fix the dependencies (it might only require changes in TCF, but I > did not dig deeper) and re-enable the contributions. Project leads of > affected projects have been added in CC. > > > Regards, > > Fred > > -- > Frederic Gurr > > Release Engineer > Eclipse Foundation > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] PDT participation in Photon
Hi, PDT project will participate in Photon simultaneous release train. Offset: +3 Version: 6.0 - https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/6.0 -- Dawid Pakuła ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] "Eclipse Foundation member" tag at GitHub
I have such field filled since a long time (at least couple months) and I've never receive github invitation. Maybe there are more requirements? -- Dawid Pakuła From: Patrick Bänziger Reply: Cross project issues Date: 31 August 2016 at 11:31:34 To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] "Eclipse Foundation member" tag at GitHub I entered my GitHub handle in my account page at Eclipse ( https://dev.eclipse.org/site_login/myaccount.php) and got an invite to join the Eclipse Foundation later that day. So it might be automatic. (Be careful when typing - you can't change it once entered) Regards, Patrick -Original Message- From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Frederic Gurr Sent: Mittwoch, 31. August 2016 11:26 To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] "Eclipse Foundation member" tag at GitHub Hi, You need to be a member of the Eclipse Foundation Github organization (https://github.com/eclipse) to get this label. I'm not sure what the exact policy is to become a member of the organization though. Regards, Fred On 31.08.2016 10:52, Karsten Thoms wrote: > Hi cross-project, > > at GitHub some developers have a tag "Eclipse Foundation member" when > writing comments, for an example see > here: https://github.com/eclipse/xtext-eclipse/issues/17 > > Does anyone know what needs to be done to get this tag? I asked > already Denis, and he does not know this and told me to raise the > question on this list. > > Thanks, > ~Karsten > > > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or > unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] PDT participation in Oxygen
Hi, PDT will be part of Oxygen with version 5.0. Offset will be like in previous releases: +3. https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/5.0 -- Dawid Pakuła ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] PDT participation in Neon
Hi Team, PDT (PHP Development Tools) will be participating in Neon Simultaneous release with an offset +2. We plan to contribute 4.0 version: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/4.0 -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PDT participation in Mars
Hi, I have an update on this. Due recent and planed changes in PHP Development Tools we decided that we contribute 3.5 (minor release) to mars. I updated our release record: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/3.5 -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 On 3 Oct 2014 at 12:58:16, Dawid Pakuła (zu...@w3des.net) wrote: > Hi Team, > > PDT (PHP Development Tools) will be participating in Mars Simultaneous > release with > an offset +2: > > We plan to contribute 3.4.1 version for now: > https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/3.4.1 > -- > Dawid Pakuła > +48 795 996 064 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Patch updates, reboot
Hi, Looks like /gitroot is no longer available on HIPP instances. See [1] [1] - https://hudson.eclipse.org/pdt/job/pdt-gerrit/607/console -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 On 28 Jan 2015 at 04:37:19, Denis Roy (denis@eclipse.org) wrote: On 27/01/15 10:12 PM, Denis Roy wrote: build.eclipse.org is proving to be problematic. At this time, all signing services as well as Proxy access to the Internet is not working. Good news -- build.eclipse.org is back online, as is signing and proxy services. At this time, everything should be restored. Denis ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Enable PDT Mylyn feature SimRel repo
Hi, By "same way" I mean add it into same category and into both eclipse releases. We waited so long, because PDT Mylyn require DLTK Mylyn ;) -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 On 11 Oct 2014 at 02:56:18, David M Williams (david_willi...@us.ibm.com) wrote: Hi Dawid, thanks for asking ... but, ... I'm not sure how to answer. When you say "in same way" do you mean they somehow conflict with each other (such as users can have only one or the other installed?) or do you must mean "conceptually" it is a similar thing? No harm in the latter, but, the former would take a close look. (Starts to get close to the "do no harm" category then). [And, sorry, I couldn't follow the bug ... it was so long and went back so many releases, I wasn't sure what I was supposed to read.] But in principle, it sounds like a good idea! Thanks, From: Dawid Pakuła To: Cross project issues , Date: 10/09/2014 05:50 PM Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Enable PDT Mylyn feature SimRel repo Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Hi, DLTK brings his Mylyn integration feature to SimRel repo (Luna SR2 and Mars). PDT also want add his Mylyn integration feature [1] to SimRel in same way. Let me know if you see any objections. [1] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=178350 -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] Enable PDT Mylyn feature SimRel repo
Hi, DLTK brings his Mylyn integration feature to SimRel repo (Luna SR2 and Mars). PDT also want add his Mylyn integration feature [1] to SimRel in same way. Let me know if you see any objections. [1] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=178350 -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] PDT participation in Mars
Hi Team, PDT (PHP Development Tools) will be participating in Mars Simultaneous release with an offset +2: We plan to contribute 3.4.1 version for now: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/3.4.1 -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit down?
Hi, Server header blocks gerrit ui. Here is a bug: [1] [1] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=443561 -- Dawid Pakula On 9 September 2014 at 10:46:47, Michael Golubev (golu...@montages.com) wrote: Hello, I have the same problem with Safari but it works in Chrome. Regards, Michael -- Michael "Borlander" Golubev Eclipse Committer (GMF, UML2Tools) at Montages Think Tank, Prague, Czech Republic 1165/1 Dvorecka, 14700, Prague-4 Podoli tek: +420 602 483 463 On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Ralf Sternberg wrote: No, it works fine from my site. Regards, Ralf Ralf Sternberg Project Lead, Remote Application Platform (RAP) EclipseSource Tel: +49 721 66 47 33-0 Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH Lammstraße 21, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany General Manager: Jochen Krause Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883 On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Lars Vogel wrote: > If I go to https://git.eclipse.org/r/ I get "Gerrit loading" but it never > finishes. Is this the same for everyone? > > Best regards, Lars > > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DLTK in Luna ?
Hi, Luna RC3 stagging repo still contain 5.0 (kepler) release. -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064 From: Alexey Panchenko alex.panche...@gmail.com Reply: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Date: 7 maja 2014 at 19:56:31 To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DLTK in Luna ? Hi, The current status is: - I recently changed version to 5.1 on master - going to contribute it to Luna ~RC1 - there should not be any compatibility problems Regards, Alex On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Simon Bernard wrote: We still got no answer about DLTK integration in Luna. Currently, in SimRel, DLTK is only at v5.0.0 (Kepler version). Hoping, we will not face last-minute compatibility problems. Simon Le vendredi 18 avril 2014 à 08:46 -0700, Simon Bernard a écrit : > Hi, > I have few questions about the next dltk integration in > Luna : > Does an update site exist to test the next version of DLTK (5.1)? > Currenlty, there still are the dltk 5.0 version, do you plan to > integrate a development version of DLTK (5.1) for M7 of Luna ? > Thx. > Simon > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
