>>>>>>
> >>>>>>If no-one objects, I will merge into the branch.
> >>>>>> Verification is
> >>>>>> already successful.
> >>>>>>
>
> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fred
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21.04.2017 23:00, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> J
n is
>>>>>>already successful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Jeff J.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Johnston
>>>>>> <jjohn...@redhat.co
;jjohn...@redhat.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:jjohn...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I have done another respin. In this case, I rebuilt the
>>>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>>>>
sed in
>>>>>>> Neon.2. I
>>>>>>>have back-versioned the
>>>>>>> Docker tooling plug-ins to 2.3.0 with the current date.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have just pushed to gerrit fo
<mailto:marcel.br...@codetrails.com>>
To:Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Date:21.04.2017 10:17
Subject:
t;>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Johnston
>>>>> <jjohn...@redhat.com
>>>>> <mailto:jjohn...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcel,
>>>>>
>>>>
lto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Date: 21.04.2017 10:17
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3
Update
Problems: To Fix andHow to Fix?
Sent by:
cross-project-issue
;>
>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Daniel Megert
>>> <daniel_meg...@ch.ibm.com <mailto:daniel_meg...@ch.ibm.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Adding eclipse.org-planning-coun...@eclipse.org
>>>
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Date: 21.04.2017 10:17
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update
Problems: To Fix andHow to Fix?
m: Frederic Gurr <frederic.g...@eclipse.org>
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: 25.04.2017 14:28
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To
Fix and How to Fix?
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Thanks Jeff,
Thi
ls.com
> <mailto:marcel.br...@codetrails.com>>
> To: Cross project issues
> <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
> Date:21.04.2017 10:17
> Su
Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Date: 21.04.2017 10:17
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update
Problems: To Fix andHow to Fix?
at 6:38 AM, Daniel Megert <daniel_meg...@ch.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Adding eclipse.org-planning-coun...@eclipse.org to this thread.
>>>
>>> Dani
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "Dr. Marcel Bruch" <marcel.br...@codetr
roject issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>> Date:21.04.2017 10:17
>> Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems:
>> To Fix andHow to Fix?
>> Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
>> --
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> Date: 21.04.2017 10:17
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To
> Fix andHow to Fix?
> Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> --
>
>
>
Adding eclipse.org-planning-coun...@eclipse.org to this thread.
Dani
From: "Dr. Marcel Bruch" <marcel.br...@codetrails.com>
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
Date: 21.04.2017 10:17
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
Hi,
I’ll briefly summarize the discussion we had at the AC yesterday:
Given that we don’t know how the OSGI resolver will behave (even after Tom
back-ported a fix to Neon) it would be preferred to just have the Apache
HTTP*** versions in Neon.3 that were already in Neon.2. This would to some
I can see org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.5.2.v20170210-0925 in
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/update-docker-2.3.1/plugins,
but it's definitely not in the aggregated repo.
On 20.04.2017 18:31, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Fred,
>
> The version of httpclient also changed in
Fred,
The version of httpclient also changed in our update-docker-2.3.1 repo from:
org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.5.2.v20161115-1643
to:
org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.5.2.v20170210-0925
Not sure why this change isn't being seen as well.
-- Jeff J.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at
Thanks Jeff,
I ran a SimRel aggregation build. The only change I can see in the list
of "Non Unique Versions used in repository" is that a different version
of org.apache.httpcomponents.httpcore is now used. Instead of
4.4.4.v20161115-1643 it's now 4.4.6.v20170210-0925.
I compared
Hi Fred,
Code Recommenders also suffers from the addition of the new HTTPClient.
Unfortunately our build master is on holidays for two weeks and I don’t know
all details yet.
However, Bug 513809 summarizes all his findings. Maybe that bug contains
relevant information to understand the issues
I've added my notes to the meeting minutes. These notes do not provide
any more detail than what's been discussed in this and the planning
council mailing lists.
My apologies for the delay.
Wayne
On 19/04/17 11:13 AM, Ed Merks wrote:
There seem to have been no notes/minutes taken during
And I spoke too soon - I didn't take the bundle containments of the feature
into account. So we now have:
> > B. Respin with the old version of httpclient: Needs a Neon.3 Orbit
> Service Release containing only the 4.3.6 version of httpclient. Needs a
> respin of Linux Tools to downgrade the
Hi,
> There seem to have been no notes/minutes taken during the meeting:
>
> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/April_05_2017
>
Sorry, I didn't see these minutes until now, only Melanie's mail on the list.
But there seems to be a misconception with the proposed solutions wrt MPC:
>
Hi Ed,
Linux tools spun a 5.3.1 release which now has a 2.3.1 version of docker
tooling. The Linux tools download site has update-docker-2.3.1 and
update-docker, both which have 2.3.1 versions of the docker.core plug-in
and docker feature. Not sure why you are not seeing this.
-- Jeff J.
On
Frederic,
There seem to have been no notes/minutes taken during the meeting:
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/April_05_2017
I recall agreeing to provide steps for reproducing the problem so that
Thomas Watson could test if the wiring resolution fix he made for Oxygen
also solves
Hi Ed,
In the last planning-council meeting you offered to evaluate if the
fixed Linux Tools package works as expected and if there are still
wiring issues.
Can you give us an update on the current state?
Regards,
Fred
On 31.03.2017 11:14, Ed Merks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The original thread is
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 11:14 +0200, Ed Merks wrote:
> As another data point, if I install the egg-laying-wool-milk-pig for
> Neon.3. The following happens. I'm prompted to accept this license:
> Red Hat, Inc. licenses these features and plugins to you under
> certain open source licenses (or
29 matches
Mail list logo
