Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

Hi, As a first step, I have disabled the Thym project in the SimRel aggregation build. Regards, Fred On 21.01.2017 02:48, Gorkem Ercan wrote: > > Hi Wayne, > We can drop Thym from the release train. We will > continue to make regular releases from marketplace. > Thanks, > -- > Gorkem > >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

Le 19/01/2017 à 16:42, Wayne Beaton a écrit : I am assuming that the combined Eclipse EMF Query/Transaction/Validation and Eclipse GMF Runtime/Notation are participating and will update the participation list just as soon as the dust settles on the project restructurings involved. Yes,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

Hi, Following the discussion on the andmore-dev mailing list [1], I'd like to let you know that the project decided to drop out of the simultaneous release. When we joined the simultaneous release last year, we hoped that this will increase the visibility of the project to the point that we

[cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

Hi,   Paho would like to participate in the Oxygen simultaneous release.  I've set our release date to the correct date on our next release (1.3.0) here: http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/iot.paho/releases/1.3.0   Thanks,   James  

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

Hi David, yes, I am a representative of Xpand. And Karsten (Thoms) already formally announced the participation in another mail. Also Xpand has an aggrecon file, so I think we are fine. Thank you! Sven 2016-12-16 15:28 GMT+01:00 David Williams : > On 12/15/2016 08:56

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

On 12/15/2016 08:56 AM, Sven Efftinge wrote: Xpand is in maintenance mode, but I understood that it needs to be included if other projects have a dependency on it. In that case, I assume it is a viable option to just include last year's release again. Is that correct? That is correct. With

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared participation in Oxygen

Hello, ATL intends to participate in Oxygen Simultaneous Release with ATL 3.8, and a +2 offset. Thanks, Frédéric > From: Wayne Beaton > Date: Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:07 PM > Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects that have not (AFAICT) declared > participation in