[cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Juno aggregation build failure and ACTF

I updated Linux Tools for RC2, but ran into an issue with ACTF not finding one of its required features. When I disabled this locally, the aggregation validated fine. The last build failed with updates from Linux Tools, ACTF, and Webtools. I updated my local repository so I do not know if

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for RC3

Fixed for the Linux Tools plugins. Linux Tools b3aggrcon updated to point to the new build. -- Jeff J. On 06/06/2012 12:09 AM, David M Williams wrote: Admittedly, there is one day left for Juno RC3, but I can't help but point out several (27) missing about.html files.

[cross-project-issues-dev] Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job?

I noticed that the Juno run.aggregator job is failing on Hudson after a bunch of RC4 changes. Is someone assigned to each of the issues (other than David)? -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Trying to aggregate source features using b3 aggregator editor

to install [source.group] for windows. So, that's just a thought ... make sure your source features/bundles have all the same filters as your code (since ... your source requires your code ... which is a bit odd anyway, but maybe a separate issues). HTH From: Jeff Johnston jjohn

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Luna M1

With CDT enabled, I have enabled Linux Tools. On 08/21/2013 10:49 AM, Doug Schaefer wrote: I've re-enabled CDT. Sorry for wasting the time of the person who put enabled=false into our file. Doug. From: Sergey Boyko serg.boyko2...@gmail.com mailto:serg.boyko2...@gmail.com Reply-To: Cross

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools Participation in Luna

This is to announce that the Linux Tools project will be participating in the Luna simultaneous release. We will be including our 3.0 release and we are a +3 project. -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools Participation in Luna

as it is can be found at: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.linuxtools/releases/3.0.0 -- Jeff J. On 09/09/2013 02:40 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote: Please include a description. Thanks, Wayne On 09/09/2013 02:38 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: This is to announce that the Linux Tools project

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR2 RC3 aggregation fails

I have a fix if it is ok for me to change some other group's b3aggrcon file. The example feature has an extraneous -Ys at the end of the identifier. I looked at the update-site referred to and that -Ys shouldn't be there. Birt also added a new contact but didn't add that contact to the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR2 aggregation is failing

I have made a patch to the m2t-acceleo.b3aggrcon file. The repo mentioned below has disappeared, but I found file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/acceleo/updates/milestones/3.4/S201401221203 Changing the repo to the location above, the aggregation validates. If someone comes along

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools last minute update for RC3

Hello, There was a request to update our RC3 offering as there were a few LTTng changes not included in our initial RC3 aggregation. I have updated the b3aggrcon file and pushed to Luna_Maintenance. If the deadline has passed, so be it, the changes will be part of RC4, otherwise, please

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminder today is last build for Luna SR1 ... and Mars M2 is close!

Not sure how we missed that about.html file, but I have just updated the Linux Tools RC4 offering to fix our problem. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - From: David M Williams david_willi...@us.ibm.com To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:08:16

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are *you* ready for M4?

I didn't know we still had to declare intent. I thought it was implied by our enablement in b3aggrcon file. Anyway, Linux Tools will be participating in Mars. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - From: David M Williams david_willi...@us.ibm.com To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are *you* ready for M4?

of participation each year helps me and everybody else know that the project is still engaged. HTH, Wayne On 04/12/14 12:34 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: I didn't know we still had to declare intent. I thought it was implied by our enablement in b3aggrcon file. Anyway, Linux Tools

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools participation in Mars

Changing the subject line as we still don't appear on the list and others have since submitted their intention and been added. Perhaps, replying to the other subject line made it hard to see. Details below. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - From: Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.com

[cross-project-issues-dev] Trying to submit a change to simrel and no gerrit validation

I'm trying to submit a change to org.eclipse.simrel.build in preparation for RC4, but the validator build isn't starting. Is there some reason for this? My project's gerrit validator is working fine. -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Almost all projects are ready for the June 10 release review

Hi Wayne, Could the Linux Tools release review also be scheduled for June 10th? We originally scheduled it for the 11th which doesn't line up. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - It was an oversight. My apologies. Thanks for looking. Wayne On 08/06/15 05:03 AM, Goulwen Le Fur

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Trying to submit a change to simrel and no gerrit validation

, but can you try touching your patch set (or, what ever the right terminology is) and we'll see if it now works after my revert in the configuration. Thanks, From: Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.com To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 06/05/2015 01:19 PM

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Trying to submit a change to simrel and no gerrit validation

). From: Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.com To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 06/04/2015 07:56 PM Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Trying to submit a change to simrel and no gerrit validation Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org

[cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit for org.simrel.build keeps asking me to rebase my change

Hello, I'm trying to get the RC4 change in for Linux Tools. I keep getting a successful build, then after I review it, it says I have to rebase my change. I do so, it rebuilds successfully and then claims I need to rebase it again. I am only changing the linuxtools.b3aggrcon file. Is anyone

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit for org.simrel.build keeps asking me to rebase my change

the build. It validated locally. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - By release, you mean you press the submit button? Could it be asking you to rebase your commit? (Which, normally can be done with the rebase button.? From: Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.com To: Cross project

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit for org.simrel.build keeps asking me to rebase my change

On 10 June 2015 at 21:36, Eike Stepper step...@esc-net.de wrote: Am 10.06.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Jeff Johnston: Hello, I'm trying to get the RC4 change in for Linux Tools. I keep getting a successful build, then after I review it, it says I have to rebase my change. I do so

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit for org.simrel.build keeps asking me to rebase my change

commit? (Which, normally can be done with the rebase button.? From: Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.com To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 06/10/2015 03:31 PM Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit for org.simrel.build keeps asking me

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools participation in Neon

Sorry. I should have said 4.3.0 minor release below. - Original Message - This is to indicate that Linux Tools intends to participate in the Neon rekease with its 4.1.0 minor release. The offset will remain at +3 -- Jeff J. ___

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools participation in Neon

This is to indicate that Linux Tools intends to participate in the Neon rekease with its 4.1.0 minor release. The offset will remain at +3 -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools will participate in Neon

This is to confirm that Linux Tools will participate in Neon with major release 5.0.0 and offset +3. -- Jeff Johnston (Linux Tools Project) ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options

[cross-project-issues-dev] Can we have a slight extension this evening

Linux Tools is trying to get our RC2 build finished, but it might be tight before 5:00 pm. Can we have a slight time extension please? We expect to have it finished. Thanks, -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can we have a slight extension this evening ... plus ...

> originator may not have either? > 3) The Neon VALIDATE.gerrit job failed with a very unusual error, so I > "cleaned workspace" and re-triggered the build. It ran ok then, so not sure > what caused original issue? > > Thanks, > > > > > From: Jeff Johns

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools RC3 just needs to finish gerrit validation

We are just waiting for gerrit validation to push our Mars.1 RC3 build. -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools RC3 just needs to finish gerrit validation

Ok, gerrit review finished and b3aggrcon is merged to Mars_Maintenance. Thanks, -- Jeff J. - Original Message - > We are just waiting for gerrit validation to push our Mars.1 RC3 build. > > -- Jeff J. > ___ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing

[cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson appears to be down

Anyone else having Hudons problems? Our Linux Tools Hudson instance cannot be reached. Error 503 Service Unavailable -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson appears to be down

Thanks. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - > Looks like it's the linuxtools instance. Just go restart it at > http://dev.eclipse.org/site_login (using the HIPP Control). > > Denis > > > On 24/05/16 04:05 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > Anyone else having Hudons

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools will participate in Oxygen with major release 6.0.0 and offset +3

This is to confirm that the Linux Tools project will participate in the Oxygen release and plans to provide major release 6.0.0 with offset +3. The release plan has been created: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.linuxtools/releases/6.0.0 with details to follow regarding planned

[cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit is failing to connect to https://hudson.eclipse.org

I am having trouble with the Linux Tools gerrit jobs. We get the launchbar stuff from the hudson launchbar-master job last successful build. I keep getting no route to host when our target file tries to connect to the repo. Any ideas? -- Jeff J.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit is failing to connect to https://hudson.eclipse.org

I tried restarting our hipp instance and now linuxtools hudson pages are unavailable (503). This is bad timing since we are trying to get RC2 out for tomorrow. - Original Message - > I am having trouble with the Linux Tools gerrit jobs. We get the launchbar > stuff from > the hudson

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit is failing to connect to https://hudson.eclipse.org

. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - > On 08/30/2016 05:32 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > > I tried restarting our hipp instance and now linuxtools hudson pages are > unavailable (503). This is bad > timing since we are trying to get RC2 out for tomorrow. > While I don't know if

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12 (Part 2)

Linux Tools has an issue. Please delay this until any day after Wednesday. That is our deadline (+3 project) for Neon.1 RC4 (final build). I don't want to compound any last minute problems we are trying to fix by figuring out why the build system is not working or tests are showing new

[cross-project-issues-dev] LDT repo doesn't exist for Neon_maintenance

The ldt repo specified in ldt.b3aggricon for the Neon_maintenance release specifies http://download.eclipse.org/ldt/releases/milestones/1.4M3 which doesn't currently exist. It appears possibly that an ldt aggregation has wiped out the milestones directory as the composites have no children. I

[cross-project-issues-dev] Requesting an extension past 5:00 pm for Linux Tools RC4a contribution

Linux Tools is requesting an extension past 5:00 pm for our RC4 contribution. We already submitted something yesterday, but we have solved a fairly major bug which can freeze the docker daemon and are being delayed by gerrit (one of our tests sometimes freezes). The patch has already gone

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems

Regarding the Linux Tools issue. This was due to the Oxygen M4 orbit repo referenced as part of a patch that upgraded the level of docker-client. I will cut a 5.3.1 release of Linux Tools today using the Orbit M6 repo. Can this be aggregated or used to patch the issue? -- Jeff J. -

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems

- > > From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project- > > issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston > > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:58 PM > > To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> > > Subj

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

Hi Ed, Linux tools spun a 5.3.1 release which now has a 2.3.1 version of docker tooling. The Linux tools download site has update-docker-2.3.1 and update-docker, both which have 2.3.1 versions of the docker.core plug-in and docker feature. Not sure why you are not seeing this. -- Jeff J. On

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

t; wrote: > > I can see org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.5.2.v20170210-0925 in > /home/data/httpd/ > *download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/update-docker-2.3.1/plugins* > <http://download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/update-docker-2.3.1/plugins>, > but it's definitely not in the aggregated r

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

gregator.BUILD__CLEAN/ws/aggregation/final/ > buildInfo/reporeports/reports/nonUniqueVersions.txt > > @All: is that the intended result? > > Regards, > > Fred > > > On 19.04.2017 20:21, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > Hi Fred, > > > > I have just pushed a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

branch. https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/95501/ If no-one objects, I will merge into the branch. Verification is already successful. -- Jeff J. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > Marcel, > > Since the respin didn't fix the probl

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

Just to confirm that the change has been merged to the Neon.3_respin branch. -- Jeff J. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > I have done another respin. In this case, I rebuilt the Linux Tools > plug-ins to use the older version > o

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

_respin aggregation build 25.04. >>>>>> (https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.neon.3_respin. >>>>>> runaggregator.BUILD__CLEAN/3/artifact/aggregation/final/ >>>>>> buildInfo/reporeports/reports/nonUniqueVersions.txt

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

at 3:31 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > Ok, I have found the problem. The Neon site has some newer dependency > plug-ins that were used by the docker-client 3.6.8. > I fixed org.eclipse.linuxtools.docker.core to demand 3.4.0, but the newer > dependencies &g

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems: To Fix and How to Fix?

. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > Should we add uninstallbundle commands in the p2.inf file for the Docker > Tooling feature to remove all the http bundles > that might have been installed by a previous version? I have found > an

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools will participate in Photon (offset +3)

Hi, Linux Tools will be participating in the Eclipse Photon release with its usual offset of +3. The start of the release plan can be found here: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.linuxtools/releases/7.0.0/plan -- Jeff J. ___

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] May need a few minutes for Linux Tools RC3 contribution

Ok, job just finished and I merged the change into master. -- Jeff J. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Just waiting for the gerrit validation job to go through before merging in > the Linux Tools RC3 contribution.

[cross-project-issues-dev] May need a few minutes for Linux Tools RC3 contribution

Hello, Just waiting for the gerrit validation job to go through before merging in the Linux Tools RC3 contribution. I will update when it is done. -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] migration of existing Eclipse projects to EPL v2

Hi Wayne, Will the v2.0 license be put into http://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/license/ any time soon? -- Jeff J. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote: > We're starting to assemble an FAQ. An answer to that question is in it. > >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Viatra is failing to aggregate for Photon M2 since xtext updated

.@eclipse.org > <cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org> on behalf of Jeff Johnston > <jjohn...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:25:48 PM > To: Cross project issues > Cc: Zoltán Ujhelyi > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Viatra is failing

[cross-project-issues-dev] EMF Parsley is failing to aggregate with new Xtext 2.13.0 update

The same problem that occurs with Viatra occurs with EMF Parsley: Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be found. Software being installed: validationSet_main 1.0.0 Missing requirement: org.eclipse.emf.parsley.dsl.feature.feature.group 1.2.0.v20170608-1320

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Viatra is failing to aggregate for Photon M2 since xtext updated

.v20170519-0752 on repository > http://download.eclipse.org/releases/photon. So I’m not sure how the problem > can occur. Since the bundle is there, I would not expect a problem. > > ~Karsten > >> Am 19.09.2017 um 19:29 schrieb Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com>: >> &g

[cross-project-issues-dev] Viatra is failing to aggregate for Photon M2 since xtext updated

Xtext updated to 2.13.0. This appears to cause Viatra to fail because it has OSGI range: [2.9.0,2.13.0) Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be found. Software being installed: validationSet_main 1.0.0 Missing requirement:

[cross-project-issues-dev] Problem with webtools repo for Oxygen.2

In doing the latest Linux Tools update for Oxygen_update, I ran into an issue with a webtools repo which does not exist. Using the date as a clue, I changed it from 3.9.0 to 3.9.2 and checked in a fix. If this is wrong, webtools-folks, please change it. Without the change, it would not validate

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools Participation in 2018.09

Linux Tools will be participating in 2018.09 with a point release that has a +3 offset. -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] WTP needs to remove 2 Dali features from simrel & 2 EPP packages (JEE + Reporting) due to missing dependent package com.sun.codemodel

Patch has been approved and merged in gerrit. -- Jeff J. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Nick Boldt wrote: > Ran into a bit of a problem in the WTP 3.10.0.M6 build in that there are 2 > dali features - org.eclipse.jpt.dbws.eclipselink.feature and >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects participating in 2019-06

Hi Wayne, The version of Eclipse Linux Tools should be 7.3.0. Thanks, -- Jeff J. On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:35 PM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > I've updated the project participation > list to reflect what I >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2020-06 Release

Hi Wayne, Linux Tools should be 7.7.0 for 2020-06. I had thought I had created the release record, but I was mistaken. Anyway, it is created now. -- Jeff J. On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:44 PM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > I've updated the records based on

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2020-12 Release

Just to note, I had thought I had created the release record, but I must not have saved it properly. I have just created the 8.1.0 release record and the N -- Jeff J. On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:30 AM Jeff Johnston wrote: > Hi Wayne, > > I somehow missed this error, but Linux Tools is

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2020-12 Release

Hi Wayne, I somehow missed this error, but Linux Tools is releasing 8.1.0 for 2020-12. We released 8.0.0 for 2020-09. We have contributed 8.1.0 to simrel for a while now so hopefully it should just be a doc issue. -- Jeff J. On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:45 PM Wayne Beaton <

[cross-project-issues-dev] Problem with repo.eclipse.org and simrel gerrit verification

I am seeing the following error trying to to get gerrit to verify for the Linux Tools RC2 simrel contribution. Can somebody take a look? I have ignored the failure and updated our contribution regardless as local validation works fine. [ERROR] Plugin

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problem with repo.eclipse.org and simrel gerrit verification

tus.io/incidents/9zv3vwwhn0rg > > Jonah > > On Tue., Jun. 8, 2021, 20:09 Jeff Johnston, wrote: > >> I am seeing the following error trying to to get gerrit to verify for the >> Linux Tools RC2 simrel >> >> contribution. Can somebody take a look? I have ignored

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-06 Participating Projects List

Hi Wayne, Please update Linux Tools to 8.3.0. I have created a release record. Thanks, -- Jeff J. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:48 AM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > Greetings Folks. It's that time again! > > I've created a participation page for the 2021-06 Release

[cross-project-issues-dev] Anyone else having issues pushing to org.eclipse.simrel.build gerrit?

I am trying to push the Linux Tools update for 2021-06 RC1 for gerrit review but I keep getting an error: To ssh://jjohns...@git.eclipse.org:29418/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build.git ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master (commit 7d8a3e6: An error happened while checking commit) error:

[cross-project-issues-dev] Linux Tools build cannot write to standard output location

Hello, Something has changed in the build infrastructure since last week and our Linux Tools master build pipeline is failing when it tries to write to the standard updates-nightly output directory we use. Is there something we can do or is this a new infrastructure issue? I didn't see any

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2022-06 Participation Page

I have created the release record for Linux Tools 8.7.0. Thanks for the reminder. -- Jeff J. On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:32 PM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > Greetings Simultaneous Release Committers! > > It's that time of quarter (actually I think that I'm at least

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2022-09 Participation

Hi Wayne, Linux Tools should be 8.8.0. I have created a release record. -- Jeff J. On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:27 PM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > Greetings folks! > > I've assembled my first pass at the Eclipse IDE 2022-09 participation page >

[cross-project-issues-dev] Should SimRel include updated JustJ

A user recently opened an issue against JDT UI because they were trying to update their 2022-06 Eclipse IDE for Java Developers and it fails because the current JustJ they had: 15.0.1 is not sufficient to update components which now require Java 17. While they can manually add the needed JustJ

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problem with Linux Tools 2023-06 M3 contribution

rit > contribution when you get that in place so I can start the process. > Keeping my fingers crossed. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 24, 2023, at 19:39, Jeff Johnston wrote: > >  > Hello, > > We have an issue with our build process that likely will

[cross-project-issues-dev] Problem with Linux Tools 2023-06 M3 contribution

Hello, We have an issue with our build process that likely will not be fixed until early tomorrow. If possible, we would have to submit our M3 milestone then. Otherwise, to not impede M3 and EPP we can wait until RC1 to submit our next build as there are no features/fixes added from M2 to M3;