t:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] LSP4E participation in Photon
> Just curious, why +3?
Because the main dependency (LSP4J) is +2.
> We are thinking of adding a component that uses it to CDT to access
the clangd language server.
You can still use it. At the moment, LSP4E tries to keep f
to recover.
Doug.
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Mickael
Istria
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:48 PM
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issu
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Mickael
Istria
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:48 PM
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
> Just curious, why +3?
Because the main dependency (LSP4J) is +2.
> We are thinking of adding a component that uses it to CDT to access the
clangd language server.
You can still use it. At the moment, LSP4E tries to keep focus on good
forward and backward compatibility, so CDT shouldn't face
Just curious, why +3? We are thinking of adding a component that uses it to CDT
to access the clangd language server.
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Mickael
Istria
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:05 AM
To:
