Re: [crossfire] Unban me from #crossfire

2005-10-15 Thread Nicolas Weeger
> Women's Rights Delenda Est. Translation for people who don't speak latin or are too lazy to google: Women's Rights must be destroyed. ___ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire

[crossfire] Unban me from #crossfire

2005-10-14 Thread Mitch Obrian
Topic. Women's Rights Delenda Est. __ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/m

Re: Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Mitch Obrian
This isn't crossfire-devel, not everything is thus directly related to cfdev on here. --- Yann Chachkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, could you *please* keep the political rants > away from this mailing list ? This is devoted to > Crossfire, not to what you think about Freedoms, > Women or

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread ERACC
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 01:28 pm Andrew Fuchs wrote: [...] > I also think that it may be a good idea to keep more information about > bans from now on. Possibly including the text of the conversation > leading up to the banning. This information *is* kept but not in a public place. The IRC Op

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Yann Chachkoff
Le Mardi 11 Octobre 2005 17:00, Mitch Obrian a écrit : > I was banned from the debain lists because the debian > people are pro-women's rights for the most part. The > ban had no effect, I post to those lists at will > (check out debian women's list for confirmation). > Point is that if you follow

Re: Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Andrew Fuchs
On 10/11/05, tchize <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This discussion should be closed, Goldwin point was reached. ... Agreed, at least in the discussion's current form. I also think that it may be a good idea to keep more information about bans from now on. Possibly including the text of the convers

Re: Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread tchize
This discussion should be closed, Goldwin point was reached. -Original Message- From: Mitch Obrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Crossfire Discussion Mailing List Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [crossfire] Unban me I'd rather not join the pro-women'

Re: Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Yann Chachkoff
Well, could you *please* keep the political rants away from this mailing list ? This is devoted to Crossfire, not to what you think about Freedoms, Women or other conspiracy theories. May I request for the list administrator to take the necessary measure to regulate what can only be labelled as

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Mitch Obrian
I'd rather not join the pro-women's rights clique. For some reason I don't believe that women who murder their husbands or children should get away (regardless of the reason), I think said women should be hanged without a drop, then just before they die taken down and taunted and then strung back u

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Mitch Obrian
6.4 billion members? The whole world is pro-women's rights? If so then I'll welcome WW3 as I can't war against the whole world by myself (thus the whole pro-women's rights world destroying it'self is preferable). --- Brendan Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/11/05, Mitch Obrian <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Mitch Obrian
--- Tchize <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Death To women's Rights. > > > > > > > Death To Jerks > Death To women's Liberties __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Mitch Obrian
:) --- Sebastian Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:00:38AM -0700, Mitch > Obrian wrote: > > I was banned from the debain lists because the > debian > [snip] > > Crossfire is a clique based project, it does not > > matter how much one contributes, if you don't obey

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Brendan Lally
On 10/11/05, Mitch Obrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was banned from the debain lists because the debian > people are pro-women's rights for the most part. The > ban had no effect, I post to those lists at will > (check out debian women's list for confirmation). I'm sorry, I seem to be a bit c

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Tchize
Mitch Obrian a écrit : >I was banned from the debain lists because the debian >people are pro-women's rights for the most part. The > > You were banned because you were abusing the bugreport system, but that's not the place to discuss about it. >ban had no effect, I post to those lists at will

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Sebastian Andersson
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:00:38AM -0700, Mitch Obrian wrote: > I was banned from the debain lists because the debian [snip] > Crossfire is a clique based project, it does not > matter how much one contributes, if you don't obey the > clique then it's felt that it's better that you leave. [snip] h

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Mitch Obrian
I was banned from the debain lists because the debian people are pro-women's rights for the most part. The ban had no effect, I post to those lists at will (check out debian women's list for confirmation). Crossfire is a clique based project, it does not matter how much one contributes, if you don

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-11 Thread Tchize
May be is it time for you to consider there is probably a good reason why you get banned from everywhere. Probably you are trying to get the world record of being banned from everywhere You are already the first person to get banned from list.debian.org, the first from bugs.debian.org, and this app

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-10 Thread Brendan Lally
On 10/10/05, Vernon T Rhyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That hasn't, and will never be the case. Rule enforcement at all > levels is by whim and mood, as with most clique-managed open-source > communities. Try as with all stable communities anywhere in the world. The nature of rules is such t

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-10 Thread Andrew Fuchs
On 10/10/05, Vernon T Rhyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > That hasn't, and will never be the case. Rule enforcement at all > levels is by whim and mood, as with most clique-managed open-source > communities. It's undoubtedly a major reason that the wordlwide crossfire > player count is in th

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-10 Thread Vernon T Rhyne
Quoting Joshua Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: And that is your way of asking to be unbanned? Placing blame on someone else? How about looking at it as: Everyone has to follow certain rules be they developer or not, DM or not, irc op or not. That hasn't, and will never be the case. Rule enfor

Re: [crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-10 Thread Joshua Wilson
And that is your way of asking to be unbanned? Placing blame on someone else? How about looking at it as: Everyone has to follow certain rules be they developer or not, DM or not, irc op or not. Mitch Obrian wrote: Ryo banned me and tor from #crossfire because no matter how much one contribut

[crossfire] Unban me

2005-10-10 Thread Mitch Obrian
Ryo banned me and tor from #crossfire because no matter how much one contributes to CF one has to fit in with the clique, be "nice" and "sociable" and accept constant art-by-committeism + the trollage by Leaf that follows when you don't (naturally, this seems to happen often enough).