Mark Wedel wrote:
>Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:
>
>
>>Why have you banned my CVS access, and why do you hate
>>mlab? I just finished mlabhell and I want mlab in for
>>1.9. It's better to have it in non-dirified format for
>>1.9 then not in at all.
>>
>>
> As per past discussions, some people w
On Sunday 05 February 2006 03:43 pm
Brendan Lally wrote:
[...]
> > Also I am offended at lauwernmark and errac's plot to
> > change mlab's culture.
>
> To a great extent I would agree, but this does not excuse criticising
> them in a CVS commit message for a commit it is not clear should have
> b
>> Also I am offended at lauwernmark and errac's plot to
>> change mlab's culture.
>
>To a great extent I would agree, but this does not >excuse criticising
>them in a CVS commit message for a commit it is not >clear should have been
>made.
>
Let's make it clear:
- there is *no* "plot to change m
Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:
> Why have you banned my CVS access, and why do you hate
> mlab? I just finished mlabhell and I want mlab in for
> 1.9. It's better to have it in non-dirified format for
> 1.9 then not in at all.
As per past discussions, some people would disagree with that statement.
On 2/4/06, Miguel Ghobangieno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why have you banned my CVS access,
You'd need to ask the person who banned you, but criticising other
developers in a cvs commit message would probably have a lot to do
with it.
> and why do you hate
> mlab?
I do not hate mlab, I think t
Why have you banned my CVS access, and why do you hate
mlab? I just finished mlabhell and I want mlab in for
1.9. It's better to have it in non-dirified format for
1.9 then not in at all.
Also I am offended at lauwernmark and errac's plot to
change mlab's culture.
__
6 matches
Mail list logo
