[crossfire] RFC: gtk client with gtk2

2006-02-09 Thread Lalo Martins
I've been running the gtk client compiling with gtk2 for about 3 months now; it works beautifully (better than with gtk1), sdl and all. The problems I know about seem to be: - SDL doesn't work for some people. I couldn't find one of those people to comment, though. It works for me. - If I

[crossfire] [patch] fix inconstency between on_same_map and get_rangevector

2006-02-09 Thread Pippijn van Steenhoven
Greetings, while working on a script that would move an NPC, one bug was found in common/map.c. A diff is supplied at the following URL: http://data.plan9.de/adjacent.txt Basically, it's get_nearest_player which calls can_detect_enemy which then calls on_same_map and if that returns yes, it

Re: [crossfire] [patch] fix inconstency between on_same_map and get_rangevector

2006-02-09 Thread Andreas Kirschbaum
Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote: while working on a script that would move an NPC, one bug was found in common/map.c. A diff is supplied at the following URL: http://data.plan9.de/adjacent.txt Basically, it's get_nearest_player which calls can_detect_enemy which then calls on_same_map and if

Re: [crossfire] Collaboration on a Java-based map editor? (repost)

2006-02-09 Thread Andreas Kirschbaum
Rick Tanner wrote: About two weeks ago (or maybe longer..) on IRC one of the developers who worked on and updated the map editor for Daimonin asked about a collaboration on a Java based editor that had a central or common core with specific side packages(?) for Crossfire and one for Daimonin.

Re: [crossfire] Collaboration on a Java-based map editor? (repost)

2006-02-09 Thread Lalo Martins
And so says Andreas Kirschbaum on 10/02/06 07:12... - The Daimonin editor requires Java 1.5. The CF-Editor still works with Java 1.4. Since switching back to 1.4 does not really make sense to me, 1.5 would become a requirement for Crossfire. Java 1.4 doesn't work for me. And sorry for

Re: [crossfire] RFC: gtk client with gtk2

2006-02-09 Thread Mark Wedel
Lalo Martins wrote: - IIRC, there was some bogosity with the autotools support - the person who wrote the patch doesn't know enough autotools to add the proper checks. I can volunteer to do this, but if someone else who's better at it than me wants to do it, even better. There are