[crossfire] CVS branches

Hello. I was wondering about the opportunity of making branches when we get close to releases. It would let people go on committing to HEAD, while ensuring code can be stabilized for release. Opinions? Flames? Comments? Ryo ___ crossfire mailing

Re: [crossfire] CVS branches

sounds like a good idea. On 7/30/05, Nicolas Weeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I was wondering about the opportunity of making branches when we get close to releases. It would let people go on committing to HEAD, while ensuring code can be stabilized for release. Opinions?

Re: [crossfire] CVS branches

Alex Schultz wrote: I think it might be good, though it might complicate things a little bit. I currently don't know anything about dealing with different branches in cvs, but I'm sure I could learn easily if I need to. I too think it would be good idea. And I don't think it would complicate

Re: [crossfire] CVS branches

I'd be more concerned about this if there were lots of commits going on, or there was a real desire to have a stable branch (eg, significant changes in main branch that may make it real unstable or incompatible, and thus you want to retain an older branch for compatibility reasons. But the