If I were to do it I would have implemented this behavior in
the server
instead of in the collecting of archetypes (that way it
could be used in
maps as well), but this is fine too.
I voluntarily choose to do that at collect time, because doing
it at item or map load time may be bad for
I uploaded the tar to cvs at
/maps-bigworld/unlinked/mlab-devel/mlab-devel.tar.gz
in my tiredness last night. Can someone remove the
tarball
/maps-bigworld/unlinked/mlab-devel/mlab-devel.tar.gz
I uploaded it to the correct path today.
__
On 9/29/05, Benjamin Lerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I plan to create Enchant Ring and Enchant Amulet scrolls that
would work like Enchant Weapon, but because it demands a little more work
than for the 2 previous patch, I'd like to know if those scrolls would
be Ok. I'd like to also
Hello.
The first one allow you to summon pet that are of lower
level that the
current pet you can summon. It is mainly a one line patch
that use the
same argument that create food or create weapon use.
Saw it on SF, sounds ok.
The second one allow to use argument with the cast command
so
Isn't there already a field in player structure for spell
argument? used when spells have delays, iirc.
I did (and still don't) see it.
If I grep for char in player.h, I obtain:
logrus ~/download/crossfire/include $ grep char player.h
... snip what is not on the pl struct
char
Resistances are bad, I agree. That would basically
make all maps in the game worthlessly easy. Same with
upping ring power. One has to, as of now, search for
good rings which, I think, is the correct way. If
anything CF needs to be made harder.
--- Nicolas Weeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
On Thursday 29 September 2005 08:21 am
Benjamin Lerman wrote:
[...]
The second one allow to use argument with the cast command so that you
can use:
cast create food waybread
or
cast summon pet monster spider
[...]
Isn't this what 'invoke is meant to do? If 'cast will do it now then
why
On 9/29/05, ERACC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Isn't this what 'invoke is meant to do? If 'cast will do it now then
why have 'invoke? Seems to me we should either leave 'cast as is or
make that change and remove 'invoke. There is no reason to have both.
I vote to leave 'cast as is because I
On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:15 pm
Andrew Fuchs wrote:
On 9/29/05, ERACC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Isn't this what 'invoke is meant to do? If 'cast will do it now then
why have 'invoke? Seems to me we should either leave 'cast as is or
make that change and remove 'invoke. There is
9 matches
Mail list logo
