Re: [crossfire] CVS - SVN conversion

2006-09-13 Thread Mark Wedel
Nicolas Weeger (Laposte) wrote: flex files that generate .c (loader.c) - not a big space user, yet at the same time, pretty trivial for most people to generate (probably any system that has gcc can pretty easily install flex if not already there). The flex files do not change very often. The

Re: [crossfire] CVS - SVN conversion

2006-09-13 Thread Mark Wedel
It will be module individual ttb - that is the default, and I think the best way to go - keeps things like branches and what not a bit more managable. Actually, it isn't the default, but easy enough to do it that way. ___ crossfire mailing

Re: [crossfire] CVS - SVN conversion

2006-09-13 Thread Mark Wedel
Mark Wedel wrote: It will be module individual ttb - that is the default, and I think the best way to go - keeps things like branches and what not a bit more managable. Actually, it isn't the default, but easy enough to do it that way. Except I can't see a way to do it in

Re: [crossfire] CVS - SVN conversion

2006-09-13 Thread Mark Wedel
A copy of the crossfire data is now in svn. Note: This is only a test copy for experimentation, and will be blown away on Monday Sept 18. Do not commit any real changes - still put those in CVS. to check it out: svn co