Le vendredi 3 août 2007, Kevin R. Bulgrien a écrit :
Here's a layout that is pretty close to the gtk-v1 client.
snip
http://krayvin.home.att.net/gtk2_gtk-v1_layout.png
Am I the only one finding this interface rather scary and cluttered by tons of
stuff ?
signature.asc
Description: This
http://krayvin.home.att.net/gtk2_gtk-v1_layout.png
Am I the only one finding this interface rather scary and cluttered by tons
of stuff ?
Nope :)
IMO both the GTK clients are too geeky... jxclient seems much better, from my
point of view.
Nicolas
--
http://nicolas.weeger.free.fr [Petit
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:41:18PM -0700, Mark Wedel wrote:
rename ac to dodge, and make it start at ten.
If working with d20 this sound reasonable.
Remove this bonus from pretty much all armor currently in the game,
and/or perhaps add penalty for most of the armors.
Keep ac of armour. But
Remove this bonus from pretty much all armor currently in the game,
and/or perhaps add penalty for most of the armors.
Keep ac of armour. But this value will reduce dodge. So a plate mail
with ac 5 will reduce the dodge value by 5.
So we'd have AC, armour (resist_physical) and dodge? Three
Quick followups:
AC: if this change is adopted, one really can't just say 'make what is
currently
AC a dodge penalty' - that will result in lots of broken items (certain items
that currently give high AC and shouldn't give that as dodge penalty). Plus,
it
becomes confusing - if I've
5 matches
Mail list logo