Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Nathaniel Kipps
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:24 PM Rick Tanner wrote: > What are the options or choices for the bridge services that you mention? I think the two mentioned were Discord and Slack. I think that both of them are great choices, due to their familiarity among large groups of people. There are also

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Nathaniel Kipps
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:16 PM Rick Tanner wrote: > I appear to be overlooking something.. Where is the "ownership" of > Crossfire shown or listed? I was operating under the assumption that it was a "benevolent dictatorship", consisting primarily of the original author (who I understand to be

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Nathaniel Kipps
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:24 PM Rick Tanner wrote: > I am not sure how the messages from IRC appeared in the discord > channel/server. I was not logged in there at the time. They appeared in a similar fashion, e.g., with the bot sending a message, but prefixing it with the original IRC nick. An

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Rick Tanner
On 1/30/19 2:10 PM, DraugTheWhopper wrote: > > > * Which bridge services should be acceptable > * Chat history retention time > * Either querying or notifying the "active people" on IRC to ensure they > consent > * Moderation and regulating access to the Discord (will there be a > need to

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Rick Tanner
On 1/31/19 11:47 PM, Mark Wedel wrote: > >  I should probably transfer ownership of crossfire to someone else - I > haven't had much time to work on it lately, and seems unlikely that I'll > find time anytime soon.  But that wasn't really the question here. I appear to be overlooking

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Rick Tanner
On 1/31/19 11:47 PM, Mark Wedel wrote: > > - Set up a gateway.  As noted, this could have issues related to > freenode policy.  One thought there is to change the topic to clear > state that there is a gateway being used.  I'm not actually sure how > messages would get attributed when moved

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Rick Tanner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Looking like this discussion has taken a direction unrelated to Crossfire and using Discord in conjunction with the existing FreeNode IRC channel. Please move the corporate data mining, privacy, historical discussion off the mailing list. Thank

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Ruben Safir
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:23:49PM +, bill billy wrote: > You can't be serious. > > So just to recap: You object to Discord because it is in cahoots with IBM to > sell data to the Nazis in preparation of some imminent fourth reich? > > Can we just have the bridge set up and move on from

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread bill billy
You can't be serious. So just to recap: You object to Discord because it is in cahoots with IBM to sell data to the Nazis in preparation of some imminent fourth reich? Can we just have the bridge set up and move on from this ridiculousness. PS. Nobody is tracking you, 1984 really got in your

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Ruben Safir
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote: > I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing > about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended > purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to > minimal and we should

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Ruben Safir
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote: > I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing > about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended > purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to > minimal and we should

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread Ruben Safir
On 2/8/19 11:54 AM, greenscene8 wrote: > I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing > about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended > purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to > minimal and we should

Re: [crossfire] Improving IRC availability with a chat bridge

2019-02-08 Thread greenscene8
I agree... Discord helps keep gaming communities together. Not worth arguing about. It's an excellent forum to discuss program ideas, the i tended purpose. If youre worried about the spy state- keep the bomb discussions to minimal and we should all be safe from the swat teams and holocusts.