Re: [crossfire] Discrete damage type

Random question to everyone at a whole - should the old 'dam' field go away at some point, that is to say, everything should use the discrete damage? In the future, probably, yes. But we must take care, as this field is used for other things than damage, IIRC... Also, we already have many

[crossfire] Discrete damage type

Hello. I just committed to SVN trunk changes that enable weapons to have discrete damage for each attack type. It works quite simply: * new object fields 'damage_attacktype', so 'damage_fire' and so, like the 'dam' field in living structure * if at least one field is set, 'dam' is ignored for

Re: [crossfire] Discrete damage type

Nicolas Weeger wrote: Hello. I just committed to SVN trunk changes that enable weapons to have discrete damage for each attack type. It works quite simply: * new object fields 'damage_attacktype', so 'damage_fire' and so, like the 'dam' field in living structure * if at least one