Re: [crossfire] Metaserver policy, was Re: Crossfire+/Crossfire2 Versioning and Metaserver

2007-04-22 Thread Robert Brockway
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Andrew Fuchs wrote: > IIRC, there where a few servers that had their own maps (exclusive to > that server). Also, giving away a map is equivalent to giving away a > spoiler, which some people wouldn't want to do. Yeah I don't think there is any intrinsic reason why all serve

Re: [crossfire] Metaserver policy, was Re: Crossfire+/Crossfire2 Versioning and Metaserver

2007-04-14 Thread mwedel
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 07:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Agreed, if we end up allowing paid subscription servers, definitely add > a column that would contain an icon to indicate pay servers. So maybe that rule should be revised to something like 'If the server requires paid subscription

Re: [crossfire] Metaserver policy, was Re: Crossfire+/Crossfire2 Versioning and Metaserver

2007-04-14 Thread Andrew Fuchs
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 07:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I basically came up with those rules fairly quickly. > > My thought on #4 - no fee for players, is to prevent confusion. If a > random person downloaded the client, fired it up, and connect to a server > only to find out he had to pa

[crossfire] Metaserver policy, was Re: Crossfire+/Crossfire2 Versioning and Metaserver

2007-04-14 Thread mwedel
I basically came up with those rules fairly quickly. My thought on #4 - no fee for players, is to prevent confusion. If a random person downloaded the client, fired it up, and connect to a server only to find out he had to pay, he may or may not try additional servers. Thus, a player could be