Alex Schultz wrote:
Agreed with the reason below, but the problem with that, is that
version.h shouldn't append -r unless it has a SVN_REV, and easier to
check in defines if SVN_REV is defined at all, instead of checking if
it's or not. Because of that, it seems like a better idea to me to
Alex Schultz wrote:
A few times, tracking the svn revision instead of the $Id strings has
been brought up. IMHO this should be done, both in the client and
server. I propose we implement it as follows in both:
Create a version.h file containing something like:
#include svnversion.h
Brendan Lally wrote:
I'm not sure it is such a great idea to send the revision number to
the metaserver, certainly not if the metaserver is going to push that
information out to clients, in that case, someone who wished to be
annoying could look for servers with revisions predating certain
Alex Schultz wrote:
Brendan Lally wrote:
I'm not sure it is such a great idea to send the revision number to
the metaserver, certainly not if the metaserver is going to push that
information out to clients, in that case, someone who wished to be
annoying could look for servers with revisions
Christian Hujer wrote:
On Friday 13 October 2006 19:15 Brendan Lally wrote:
Likewise, although the clients need only open a connection to the
metaserver to recieve the server list, having the official clients
send their revision numbers by default would give some indication as
to which
Mark Wedel wrote:
It should actually get that version number from autoconf, like it does
now.
Then as part of that, for official releases, the -dev tag can be removed from
configure.ac
I didn't know that autoconf currently stored that. That makes sense to me.
In addition, if the
A few times, tracking the svn revision instead of the $Id strings has
been brought up. IMHO this should be done, both in the client and
server. I propose we implement it as follows in both:
Create a version.h file containing something like:
#include svnversion.h
#define BASE_VERSION 2.0.0-dev
On 10/13/06, Alex Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few times, tracking the svn revision instead of the $Id strings has
been brought up. IMHO this should be done, both in the client and
server. I propose we implement it as follows in both:
This version would both be used in the
Brendan Lally wrote:
I'm not sure it is such a great idea to send the revision number to
the metaserver, certainly not if the metaserver is going to push that
information out to clients, in that case, someone who wished to be
annoying could look for servers with revisions predating certain bug
On 10/13/06, Christian Hujer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Likewise, although the clients need only open a connection to the
metaserver to recieve the server list, having the official clients
send their revision numbers by default would give some indication as
to which versions of the clients
10 matches
Mail list logo
