Re: [crossfire] msg/endmsg in maps/objects

2006-10-09 Thread Mark Wedel
Kevin R. Bulgrien wrote: Mark Wedel wrote: Kevin R. Bulgrien wrote: Mark Wedel wrote: Ideally, I think most of the newlines from the msg/endmsg structures should be removed - the client is plenty smart enough to do proper wrapping. There are also a few messages which should have the

Re: [crossfire] msg/endmsg in maps/objects

2006-10-08 Thread Kevin R. Bulgrien
Mark Wedel wrote: Kevin R. Bulgrien wrote: Mark Wedel wrote: Ideally, I think most of the newlines from the msg/endmsg structures should be removed - the client is plenty smart enough to do proper wrapping. There are also a few messages which should have the '[fixed]' tag added, since

[crossfire] msg/endmsg in maps/objects

2006-10-08 Thread Kevin R. Bulgrien
Mark Wedel wrote: Kevin R. Bulgrien wrote: Mark Wedel wrote: Ideally, I think most of the newlines from the msg/endmsg structures should be removed - the client is plenty smart enough to do proper wrapping. There are also a few messages which should have the '[fixed]' tag added, since

Re: [crossfire] msg/endmsg in maps/objects

2006-09-25 Thread Mark Wedel
Kevin R. Bulgrien wrote: Mark Wedel wrote: On a broader scale, there is a problem with most of the msg/endmsg in maps/objects. They are pre-formatted for a certain width. If your text window is wider, it isn't terrible - it just doesn't use the full width. If your window is a bit

Re: [crossfire] msg/endmsg in maps/objects

2006-09-24 Thread Kevin R. Bulgrien
Mark Wedel wrote: On a broader scale, there is a problem with most of the msg/endmsg in maps/objects. They are pre-formatted for a certain width. If your text window is wider, it isn't terrible - it just doesn't use the full width. If your window is a bit smaller, it gets really ugly,