The problem with drawing a bright line is that somebody is inevitably
left on the other side. Many working groups have drawn a standard called
C99; we do not have to rigidly adhere to it, but instead of requiring
specific versions of a specific toolchain, we should write portable code
reasonably
- Variable length arrays (may be useful in future)
Which the C11 standard kindly removed. The stupidest decision by any standards
committee ever: to remove perhaps the most important improvement in the
previous standard just because some fool compiler manufacturer had not been
able to
On 04/22/2014 03:20, Tolga Dalman wrote:
And to follow that, if there are features of a specific version of
the language that would be useful, say the requirement is 'the
compile you use must support foo. foo is known to be supported in
gcc x, visual studio y, .. If your compiler is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2014 11:19, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
It would be nice to sit down and come up with a roadmap. I've
been doing so much 'cleanup' work lately because I didn't have
anything specific in mind to work on.
What happened to that rebalancing-related
4 matches
Mail list logo
