Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Runtime Model] Web application update

2013-12-30 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Well that depends whether we want to add the ability to crosswalk itself updating over the wire, instead of letting the stores to that on Tizen. I think that we want to do the latter Kenneth On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Xinchao He wrote: > Thanks for your comments, it's sound more reasonable

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Runtime Model] Web application update

2013-12-29 Thread Xinchao He
Thanks for your comments, it's sound more reasonable. For local package updating, using --install switch instead, if the package is installed yet, try to update it. But for remote package updating, think --update switch is needed, so the package should be updated like this: , | $ xwalk --upda

Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Runtime Model] Web application update

2013-12-27 Thread Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Why isn't update not just a part of installation? You try to install but an existing installation is detected and it is updated instead? That way we can probably avoid the --update argument. Anyway, lgtm On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Xinchao He wrote: > Summary: > This feature will enable t

[Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Runtime Model] Web application update

2013-12-18 Thread Xinchao He
Summary: This feature will enable to upgrade an installed application to the newer version. When updating, all application meta data and resource will be replaced by the application with a higher version number and the same application id, and all stored application data, like local storage, auto