[crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread Fredrik Rinnestam
(Yes i realize the irony of not attaching my own) [1] So crux 3.3 is approaching and with that release we will introduce signify[2] as a way to do checksum and signing. To start with, core, opt and xorg will be signed. And to allow all these ports to be signed, we must distribute the private key t

Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread markus schnalke
[2016-10-11 11:05] Fredrik Rinnestam > > So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in > either opt or xorg! ... and then transmit the fingerprint over a second channel, or at least ensure good trust paths to the keys. Otherwise it's a leap of faith. meillo __

Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread Fredrik
On 2016-10-11 11:15, markus schnalke wrote: > [2016-10-11 11:05] Fredrik Rinnestam >> >> So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in >> either opt or xorg! > > ... and then transmit the fingerprint over a second channel, or at > least ensure good trust paths to the keys.

Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread Svyatoslav Mishyn
(Tue, 11 Oct 11:05) Fredrik Rinnestam: > So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in > either opt or xorg! and contrib? -- I am not a native English speaker, so feel free to correct any spelling or grammatical errors! signature.asc Description: PGP signature _

Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread Predrag Ivanovic
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:27:26 +0200 Fredrik wrote: >>> So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in >>> either opt or xorg! >> >> ... and then transmit the fingerprint over a second channel, or at >> least ensure good trust paths to the keys. Otherwise it's a leap >> of fait