Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-13 Thread Fredrik Rinnestam 
On 2016-10-11 13:37, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote:
> (Tue, 11 Oct 11:05) Fredrik Rinnestam:
>> So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in
>> either opt or xorg!
> 
> and contrib?

contrib will probably also be signed. Just that i'm not responsible for
that :-).

What prompted my initial mail was that 3.3 branches for opt and xorg are
imminent
___
crux-devel mailing list
crux-devel@lists.crux.nu
https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel

Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread Predrag Ivanovic 
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:27:26 +0200
Fredrik wrote:

>>> So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in
>>> either opt or xorg!
>>
>> ... and then transmit the fingerprint over a second channel, or at
>> least ensure good trust paths to the keys. Otherwise it's a leap
>> of faith.
>
>Indeed!
>
Something like this might make it easier to confirm them :)

gpg --with-colons --fingerprint fredrik at rinnestam dot se | grep fpr | cut -d 
':' -f 10 | hex2words

P7Q7950O88O2RPSNQ799R591R574862R61S68R07
fblorna fgrgubfpbcr cerpyhqr nezvfgvpr arjobea cvbarre ghzbe juvzfvpny 
fgbcjngpu arohyn gbczbfg zvenpyr gbczbfg ulqenhyvp arpxynpr pburerapr snyybhg 
ibpnyvfg bepn nzhfrzrag

4S5461Q35O847O532R578893PQP9S9868480OP60
qebccre rdhngvba snyybhg fbpvnoyr renfr whcvgre xvpxbss ragrecevfr 
ohmmneq rfxvzb arjobea zbynffrf fcvaqyr ergebfcrpg jnssyr yrggreurnq zheny 
vagragvba fubjtvey sbegvghqr

02NP4321RN4S480O9N2NON5OQROQ8Q29143P559O
nppehr crargengr pehpvny pnzrybg gebwna qbphzrag qrnqobyg nezvfgvpr 
chcvy punzoreznvq funqbj rkbqhf gnpgvpf dhnagvgl bcgvp pregvsl onobba pebffbire 
rqvpg abejrtvna

(hint: g?)

Pedja
___
crux-devel mailing list
crux-devel@lists.crux.nu
https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel

Re: [crux-devel] Request for GPG/PGP keys!

2016-10-11 Thread markus schnalke 
[2016-10-11 11:05] Fredrik Rinnestam 
>
> So please reply and attach your public keys if you maintain ports in
> either opt or xorg!

... and then transmit the fingerprint over a second channel, or at
least ensure good trust paths to the keys. Otherwise it's a leap
of faith.


meillo
___
crux-devel mailing list
crux-devel@lists.crux.nu
https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel