On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
>> > This time insertion and collection of asynchronous jobs is implemented
>> > via ioctl calls.
>> Thanks it looks nice.
> But it's all kippers and curtains. When testing an async-able speed.c on
> a multiprocessor system, interactivity went to
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 08:41:10AM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 04:38 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > This time insertion and collection of asynchronous jobs is implemented
> > via ioctl calls.
>
> Thanks it looks nice.
But it's all kippers and curtains. When testing an async-
On 10/01/2010 04:38 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> This time insertion and collection of asynchronous jobs is implemented
> via ioctl calls.
Thanks it looks nice.
> What do you think about the preallocated list items? The implementation is
> flexible enough to allow for creating them right when they're
