ANNOUNCE: Open Source implementation of MS CSP

2000-07-28 Thread Sergio Tabanelli
I don't know if this can interest someone on this list, but in the attached announce, together with and open source implementation of MS CSP, you can find a tool that can be used to substitute the _NSAKEY in the advapi32.dll. ciao Sergio Tabanelli Project Manager Consultant Fabbrica Servizi

Re: NSA back doors in encryption products

2000-05-30 Thread Sergio Tabanelli
I have cheked again and I have found that I was completely wrong the NSAKEY is still used and the verification process does not change in W2K. I am realy sorry and I apologize for my big mistake. Sergio Tabanelli -Original Message- From: Victor Duchovni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sergio

Re: NSA back doors in encryption products

2000-05-29 Thread Sergio Tabanelli
Maybe this is not so important, but I have to repeat that in W2K OS the NSAKEY is still present but not used. All CSPs are verified only with the primary key and if the verification process fails the CSP module is discarded without any further verification. Sergio Tabanelli -Original

Re: Automatic passphrase generation

2000-05-10 Thread Sergio Tabanelli
. If you start with only the universe of easy words, the maximum entropy of your passphrase is is limited. Pull, stretch, squish and mangle it any way you like -- you cannot increase the entropy of something by a deterministic algorithm. You can at best obscure it well --Perry] Sergio Tabanelli

Re: MS on NSA_KEY in Windows

2000-05-03 Thread Sergio Tabanelli
Sergio Tabanelli wrote: [About OffloadModExpo] [...] 4. In any case in my opinion it is completely unacceptable that a system administrator can access users’s private keys without the user knowledge and assent. I don't see a way to prevent an admin from gaining access to a user's keys

Re: MS on NSA_KEY in Windows

2000-05-02 Thread Sergio Tabanelli
it public. Sergio Tabanelli P.S. I've checked again for this functionality in NT4 sp3-4-5-6 low and high encryption packs, and I didn't found it, I think that this is a realy strange think, if I am not wrong, this means that the secutity patch is for a non functionality. I've also to confirm