[Moderator's note: I'm allowing through this one last message, but
we've really, really gotten off topic here. --Perry]
>> No, it only makes it illegal to use false or misleading information to
>> send commercial e-mail. That's a rather important distinction.
>
>So, I get non-commercial emails a
I allowed through a couple of messages on UCE from The Usual Suspects,
partially because they discussed things like anonymous remailers etc.,
but unless something very interesting comes through I'd like to end
this here, given that we're not really the right list for the
discussion.
Perry
--
The natural consequence of zero-cost ("free") speech
is to make freedom from speech (privacy) unquenchably
attractive.
If you would preserve anonymity, you must raise the
costs of those who will not shut up. We technocrats
have had years to do something and we have not; the
ball is now in othe
> No, it only makes it illegal to use false or misleading information to
> send commercial e-mail. That's a rather important distinction.
So, I get non-commercial emails all the time, from topica mailing
lists and from people forwarding New York Times articles and such.
They come with embedded ad
