At 12:27 PM 11/27/2003, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
RC4 is extremely weak for some applications. A block cipher is greatly
preferable.
I'm afraid that I can't agree with this howling logical error. RC4 is
showing its age, but there are other stream ciphers that are acceptable,
and there are
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 02:45:47PM +1100, Greg Rose wrote:
At 12:27 PM 11/27/2003, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
RC4 is extremely weak for some applications. A block cipher is greatly
preferable.
I'm afraid that I can't agree with this howling logical error. RC4 is
showing its age, but there
- Original Message -
From: Perry E.Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:24 AM
Subject: Problems with GPG El Gamal signing keys?
Some notes have been floating around claiming that there are bugs in
GPG's use of El Gamal keys. For
- Original Message -
From: Perry E.Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some notes have been floating around claiming that there are bugs in
GPG's use of El Gamal keys. For example, see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=E1AOvTM-0001nY-00%40alberti.g10code.deoe=UTF-8output=gplain
Can
1) Not GPL or LPGL, please. I'm a fan of the GPL for most things, but
for embedded software, especially in the security domain, it's a
killer. I'm supposed to allow users to modify the software that runs
on their secure token? And on a small platform where there won't be
such things as
