[Users] ANNOUNCE: Openswan 1.0.0 Released

2004-01-03 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 20:00:44 -0500 (EST) From: Ken Bantoft [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Users] ANNOUNCE: Openswan 1.0.0 Released List-Subscribe:

Re: digsig - when a MAC or MD is good enough?

2004-01-03 Thread John Gilmore
Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the US. Section 1102 of that act: Whoever corruptly-- (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an

Re: Any good books or URLs for WinXP crypto security?

2004-01-03 Thread t . c . jones
Securing Mobile Computers with Windows XP Professional This article examines specific threats that can affect mobile computers, including how security tools and privacy services included in the Windows XP Professional operating system provide solutions to combat these threats.

Re: digsig - when a MAC or MD is good enough?

2004-01-03 Thread Ian Grigg
John Gilmore wrote: Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the US. Section 1102 of that act: Whoever corruptly-- (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object's integrity or

Re: [OT] Encryption

2004-01-03 Thread Sidney Markowitz
[Moderator's note: that's one -- but only one -- of the reasons I think Bob found the exchange so funny. --Perry] Ah, I thought he was being honest but naive and couldn't understand how he could apply for clearance from the US for an import. I looked at the rest of the thread in their mailing

Walton's Mountain notaries

2004-01-03 Thread Carl Ellison
-Original Message- From: Paul A.S. Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: RE: Repudiating non-repudiation I was recently the subject of identity theft. Specifically, the thieves had my SSN (SIN, actually, since it is in Canada), and my

Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed)

2004-01-03 Thread David Wagner
Jerrold Leichter wrote: All of this is fine as long as there is a one-to-one association between machines and owners of those machines. Consider the example I gave earlier: A shared machine containing the standard distribution of the trusted computing software. All the members of the group