If you have
to be that confident in your computer security to use the payment
system, it's not going to have many clients.
Maybe the trusted computing platform (palladium) may have something to
offer after all, namely enabling naive users to use services that
require confidence in their own
From: R.A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 25, 2005 8:34 AM
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: On the orthogonality of anonymity to current market demand
...
That is to say, your analysis conflicts with the whole trend towards
T-0 trading, execution, clearing and
--- Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Another issue involves the ease of use when switching between a
[slower] anonymous service and a fast non-anonymous service. I have
a
tool called metaprox on my website (see URL in sig) that allows you
to
choose what proxies you use on a
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, cyphrpunk wrote:
Is it possible that Skype doesn't use RSA encryption? Or if they do,
do they do it without using any padding, and is that safe?
You may want to read the report itself:
http://www.skype.com/security/files/2005-031%20security%20evaluation.pdf
and
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:47:22AM -0700, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, cyphrpunk wrote:
Is it possible that Skype doesn't use RSA encryption? Or if they do,
do they do it without using any padding, and is that safe?
You may want to read the report itself:
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/
0,289142,sid14_gci1136763,00.html?track=NL-102ad=530772
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:38:36 +0200
To: cyphrpunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies to: John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian G [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cryptography@metzdowd.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL
