On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:42:56PM -0800, Trevor Perrin wrote:
Perhaps this is further support for Iang's contention that we should
expect newer, interactive protocols (IM, Skype, etc.) to take the lead
in communication security. Email-style message encryption may simply
be a much harder
At 5:58 PM -0800 2/24/06, Ed Gerck wrote:
A phone number is not an envelope -- it's routing information, just like
an email address. Publishing the email address is not in question and
there are alternative ways to find it out, such as search engines.
Oh really? Then you should be able to
John W Noerenberg II wrote:
At 5:58 PM -0800 2/24/06, Ed Gerck wrote:
A phone number is not an envelope -- it's routing information, just
like
an email address. Publishing the email address is not in question and
there are alternative ways to find it out, such as search engines.
Oh really?
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Florian Weimer wrote:
I couldn't find a PGP key server operator that committed itself to
keeping logs confidential and deleting them in a timely manner (but I
didn't look very hard, either). Of course, since PGP hasn't
progressed as faster as our
At 04:52 PM 2/26/2006, Ben Laurie wrote:
Don't forget that the ability to decrypt is just as good as a signature
to prove association of the key.
All it needs is for one successful trojan that steals your private
key/passphrase and plausible deniability is available again. :)
Does anybody
Somebody, probably Florian, wrote:
I couldn't find a PGP key server operator that committed itself to
keeping logs confidential and deleting them in a timely manner (but I
didn't look very hard, either).
Keyservers are a peripheral issue in PGP -
important for convenience and for quick
Does anyone have an idea of what this is about? (From Computerworld):
-- Jerry
FEBRUARY 23, 2006 (NETWORK WORLD) - A University of Toronto professor
and researcher has demonstrated for the first time a new technique for
safeguarding data
