just received from IP
cheers
From: Susan Landau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: June 13, 2006 10:35:37 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: report on security risks of applying CALEA to VoIP
Tuesday 13 June 2006 at 10:35
Below you'll find an executive summary of
OK, after various queries I figured out that the page has moved and I
was being screwed up by cached data or something. The correct URL for
the 802.11 time lines web page is
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm
Sorry,
Donald
-Original Message-
From:
David Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
Secret and patented are mutually exclusive.
--
Ben Pfaff
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://benpfaff.org
On 6/14/06, Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
Secret and patented are mutually exclusive.
--
Ben Pfaff
For the uspto, yes. For sipo, not
| The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
| block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
|
| Secret and patented are mutually exclusive.
Actually, they are not. There is a special provision in the law under
which something submitted to the patent office can be
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:33:46 -0700, Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
Secret and patented are mutually exclusive.
Perhaps not. The
