In my personal experience, if you are developing a mass-market item with
conventional crypto (e.g., SSL, S/MIME, etc ) then it is fairly routine to
get a commodity export license which lets you sell globally.
Disclaimers abound, including that I'm not a lawyer and certainly don't
speak for IBM.
From http://cryptanalysis.eu/blog/2007/12/29/mifare-crypto1:
"MiFare’s CRYPTO1 stream cipher has captured my attention for a while.
However, hardware reverse-engineering is not a field I actively engage
in. So I was very happy when Karsten Nohl (University of Virginia),
Starbug and Henryk P
"Alan" writes:
-+
| What are the rules these days on crypto exports. Is a review
| still required? If so, what gets rejected?
|
The following is a recent interaction with specialty
export counsel, though somewhat modified as I detoxed
it from base64 to ASCII plaintext and from i
Dan wrote:
> Let's not do this or we'll have to talk about JF Kennedy
> who, at least, bought his votes with real money.
That's because Democrats had become more professional,
and the tradition of buying votes with whiskey
only works for the retail level, not wholesale.
Dan also wrote:
May I po
re:
Storm, Nugache lead dangerous new botnet barrage
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1286808,00.html
from above:
The creators of these Trojans and bots not only have very strong
software development and testing skills, but also clearly know how
security v
