Darren J Moffat wrote:
Warnings aren't enough in this context [ whey already exists ] the
only thing that will work is stopping the page being seen - replacing
it with a clearly worded explanation with *no* way to pass through
and render the page (okay maybe with a debug build of the browser
Dan Geer's comment about the street price of heroin as a metric for
success has me thinking - are people tracking the street prices of
digital underground goods over time? The Symantec Threat Reports do seem
to report advertised prices for a basket of goods, starting in Volume XI
(March 2007)
At 11:21 PM +0100 9/9/08, Dave Howe wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Warnings aren't enough in this context [ whey already exists ] the
only thing that will work is stopping the page being seen - replacing
it with a clearly worded explanation with *no* way to pass through
and render the page
David Molnar writes, in part:
-+---
| Dan Geer's comment about the street price of
| heroin as a metric for success has me thinking -
| are people tracking the street prices of digital
| underground goods over time?
This material is in fact tracked but not so
Dave Howe wrote:
One thing that concerns me is that in the new release of firefox, there
appears to be NO way to get to a site that has a bad certificate (or
self signed certificate) other than overriding the warning permanently -
no ok let me see it, I have seen the warning and want to look
Sigh... typing in a moving vehicle. This is
the right URL, verified by cutpaste.
http://geer.tinho.net/ieee/ieee.sp.geer.0801.pdf
Sorry.
--dan
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe
James A. Donald wrote:
Peter Gutmann wrote:
Unfortunately I think the only way it (and a pile of other things as
well) may get stamped out is through a multi-pronged approach that
includes legislation, and specifically properly thought-out
requirements
I agree. I'm sure this is a
[Moderator's note: with my other hat on, let me say that although I'm
a libertarian, I do not want to have this mailing list fill with
libertarianism vs. statism arguments. I'm going to cut this off pretty
quickly. --Perry-as-moderator]
William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:29:32PM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
I agree. I'm sure this is a world-wide problem, and head-in-the-sand
cyber-libertarianism has long prevented better solutions. The market
doesn't work for this, as there is a competitive *disadvantage* to
providing
Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 11:21 PM +0100 9/9/08, Dave Howe wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Warnings aren't enough in this context [ whey already exists ] the
only thing that will work is stopping the page being seen - replacing
it with a clearly worded explanation with *no* way to pass through
10 matches
Mail list logo
