Re: "Cube" cryptanalysis?

Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 11:08 AM -0700 8/21/08, Greg Rose wrote: >> Adi mentioned that the slides and paper will go online around the >> deadline for Eurocrypt submission; it will all become much clearer >> than my wounded explanations then. > > There now: > Give

Re: combining entropy

Jonathan Katz wrote: > I think it depends on what you mean by "N pools of entropy". I can see that my description was a bit weak, yes. Here's a better view, incorporating the feedback: If I have N people, each with a single pool of entropy, and I pool each of their contributions together

Re: combining entropy

On 10/24/2008 03:40 PM, Jack Lloyd wrote: > Perhaps our seeming disagreement is due to a differing interpretation > of 'trusted'. I took it to mean that at least one pool had a > min-entropy above some security bound. You appear to have taken it to > mean that it will be uniform random? Thanks, t

Re: Who cares about side-channel attacks?

Thierry Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I find the question should be refined. It could if there was a large enough repondent base to draw samples from :-). This is one of those surveys that can never be done because no vendor will publicly talk to you about security measures in their embed