... appears to be real: Collage
(http://..uses-twitter-flickr-to-let-dissidents-send-secret-messages/),
developed by a group at Georgia Tech...
Whenever I hear of an academic institution announcing to the world
a cryptographic product or component with phrases such as "dissidents
in China" and "
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:25 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> (Given their prediction that they won't be done with a 1024-bit number
> within 5 years, but they will be done "well within the next decade",
> which 1024-bit number are they starting to factor now? I hope it's a
> major key that certifies big
I emailed the author Austin Heap again yesterday to ask for some
technical details. He responded and declined to provide any
information.
At this point, I have seen no evidence that Haystack exists.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:10 PM, wrote:
> > Based on those statements, I'm going to speculate t
Yesterday I asked about Haystack, an anti-censorship system that
appears to exist mainly as newspaper articles. So today I ran across
another system, which appears to be real: Collage (http://gigaom.com/2010/07/12/software-uses-twitter-flickr-to-let-dissidents-send-secret-messages/
), develo
> It's worth a quote from the paper at CRYPTO '10 on factorization of a
> 768-bit number:
A good paper by top academics.
> Another conclusion from
> our work is that we can confidently say that if we restrict ourselves to
> an open community, academic effort such as ours and unless something
> dr
>
> Based on those statements, I'm going to speculate that the client
> connects to a static list of innocuous-looking proxies and that they
> are relying on keeping those proxies secret.
>
Hmm, what is the chance that the static ones redirect to
other proxies (some of which might even be
