On 6 Oct 2009, at 14:48, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
As explained at http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper/stampnew.htm they
moved to alt.security.pgp in 2002. But ... the latest timestamp
summary I can see there is from May 2009, so I guess the point stands,
unless it's just google groups that won
On 5 Oct 2009, at 16:04, Ian G wrote:
My view is that there is no demand for this as a service. The
apparent need for it is more a paper requirement that came out of
PKI world's search for a perfect product than any business need.
E.g., if you think you want it, you might be better reward
At 20:59 -0400 1/5/07, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>http://www.cafepress.com/09f9
There is also http://www.cafepress.com/09f911029d74e35
Which has a wider range of extra artwork.
f
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscrib
and the data that Eric S. Johansson got:
-=-=- forwarded text -=-=-
this is frustrating. I have run through the exact same calculations and
come up with a very different answer. The answers I came up with the
show that at worst case, spammers with zombies would almost have enough
horsepower to
This was posted on the ASRG list - the IRTF Anti Spam Research Group list,
which at first reading indicates that the future for Hashcash/Camram may be
limited.
Eric Johansson the camram developer has some different numbers which he
has just run that I will dig out and forward.
f
--- beg