On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:07:49 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which seem to be aimed at a drop in replacement for SSL (with a
working example using Firefox and Apache). They seem to rest on a key
exchange or agreement based on a shared secret.
As opposed to, say, RFC 4279,
Leichter, Jerry wrote:
No real technical data I can find on the site, and I've never seen
a site with so little information about who's involved. (Typically,
you at least get a list of the top execs.) Some ex-spooks? Pure
snake oil? Somewhere in between?
He's likely called Paul McGough, of
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Leichter, Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know anything about a company called 2factor (2factor.com)?
They're pushing a system based on symmetric cryptography with, it
appears, some kind of trusted authority. Factor of 100 faster
than SSL. More secure
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Leichter, Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know anything about a company called 2factor (2factor.com)?
They're pushing a system based on symmetric cryptography with, it
appears, some kind of trusted authority. Factor of 100 faster
than SSL. More secure
Anyone know anything about a company called 2factor (2factor.com)?
They're pushing a system based on symmetric cryptography with, it
appears, some kind of trusted authority. Factor of 100 faster
than SSL. More secure, because it authenticates every message.
No real technical data I can find
