> " " == Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tyler Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
>> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
>> > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
>> > implementation).
- Original Message -
From: "Tyler Close" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 4:31 AM
Subject: Choosing an implementation language
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > I was thinking o
Tyler Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
> > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
> > implementation). Anyone got any thoughts on that?
>
> Given the nature of rec
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:31:26PM -0400, Tyler Close wrote:
> On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
> > templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
> > implementation). Anyone got any thoughts on that?
>
> Giv
to secure computing.
Cheers, Scott
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Close [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Choosing an implementation language
On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> I was thinking of doing
On Thursday 02 October 2003 09:21, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> I was thinking of doing a C++ implentation with classes and
> templates and stuff. (By contrast OpenSSL is a C
> implementation). Anyone got any thoughts on that?
Given the nature of recent, and past, bugs discovered in the
OpenSSL impleme
